Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Sparkin'
1 minute ago, Newt said:

Well I think Venus made a good assumption, but as I said, if Alle is third party then theres no reason to focus on her right now

@Venus really? Do you think I'm suspicious?

I didn't say suspicious (--__--) , but you're playing different than before...

What's with the random votes and filler posts?

EDIT: I mean your first vote at the day and the posts who only say things that were said before.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 478
  • Created
  • Last Reply
21 minutes ago, Newt said:

Well I think Venus made a good assumption, but as I said, if Alle is third party then theres no reason to focus on her right now

@Venus really? Do you think I'm suspicious?

Venus focusing on me right now is actually really anti-town because they're giving scum information on who third parties might be.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Sparkin'
4 minutes ago, Alisae said:

Venus focusing on me right now is actually really anti-town because they're giving scum information on who third parties might be.

LOL, ok now I'm laughing.

 

Even you should know that. Third-Party.Is.Bad.Doesn't.Matter.Which.

So I'm anti-town for worrying a role that lowers gravely our chances of winning? LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Venus said:

LOL, ok now I'm laughing.

 

Even you should know that. Third-Party.Is.Bad.Doesn't.Matter.Which.

So I'm anti-town for worrying a role that lowers gravely our chances of winning? LOL

Yeah you are.

What makes this more anti-town is the fact that this is a push being made when there's an outed guilty.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Sparkin'
1 minute ago, Alisae said:

Yeah you are.

What makes this more anti-town is the fact that this is a push being made when there's an outed guilty.

1 hour ago, Venus said:

Never said that you had to change the votes on Nick. I made my point clear.

How many times do I have to quote this?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Venus said:

How many times do I have to quote this?

A lot apparently since its garbage.

1 minute ago, Megagun said:

I must agree with Venus (cough cough) lol. Third parties often win games if unchecked. That said, we need evidence before striking them down. Currently, NickCrash is a higher chance of an enemy lynch.

Its Day 1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So heres 2 way this can go assuming lykoshand did not lie

 

He targeted amine and only nickcrash visited kappa

He targeted nickcrash which in this case we have the possibility of lynching a mafia or a townie that can do stuff

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't need to be clarified because if it is, it give scum more details about if he's a watcher or a Tracker, and thats information town can't risk giving to scum. Its better that scum just not know and be paranoid about what he is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our innocent civilian Amine...perished off :/ [feels scared man]

May your soul rest in peace Amine....

Wah!, so here we are with a clear information from on of us that NickCrash is guilty. Other suspects are even targeted b4 and I think, we are closer to lynch a non-aligned town member on the very first day!

Well, anyway I'll cast my votes after a while. Let's see what role I got and ugh...I missed my NA o: 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, I know that the knife thrower is the mafia's killing role, that's what called my attention. And I forgot to vote, I don't want to abstain, so...

 

[Eliminate] NickCrash

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Sparkin'

Arguing with Alisae like this brings nothing new.

 

I'd change my vote back to Nick Crash, but the only thing that Lykos has is that Nick visited Amine, and not Amine being visited by Nick. Which means that if Nick's not guilty, there was someone else that visited Amine that killed them.

 

The other thing that's not fitting here is Nick claiming a non-visiting role, when Lykos says that he did visit someone. Knowing the one that's lying is something that'll happen only at the end of the day, so I'll side with neither.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Venus said:

Knowing the one that's lying is something that'll happen only at the end of the day, so I'll side with neither.

tbh Nick did say he was going to be afk for 15h straight, so I wouldn't wait until so late to tell a defensive lie if I were him

Link to post
Share on other sites

So... I just got back from after school activities, but still have a good amount of other school works. Here are my thoughts atm tho.


(1) I think that Lykos is town for the most part as I don't think scum would do such a bold move like what Alisae mentioned. Other than that, there aren't any gains from doing so. Even if Nick flips town for some reason, I'd still see Lykos as town as it may be due to simply being wrong as tracker or something.

 

(2) I think Nick is mafia. Entering the game, he never even tried to respond to the accusation and simply went by nonchalantly. When directly confronted, he gives off a weak defense by softing a non visiting role.

 

(3) Megagun might be mafia as he seemed to easily come into the defense of Nick inadvertedly and his posts seem to be against town goals.

 

(4) Newt seems genuine from his posts and isn't cautious and calculating unlike his scum counterpart.

 

(5) Venus is more or less town in my eyes. He easily pulls off such accusations as town unlike his towny scum counterpart. Besides, I agree with his points and they are sensible.

 

(6) Alisae is suspicious. For the person who suggested massclaiming to not do it when backed into a corner, I think that just fighting with words shows signs of a possibility of being a coyote or at least a TP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Meteor Admin Divergent I think I agree with you on everything, but I have the feeling Nick isn't mafia. I think if he was, he would try to explain his visit, but he just said his role cannot visit. That seems a bit weird, but its just my opinion.

By the way, you didn't answer my question! Do you liek beans? ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Alistair I already voted on him. And I'll keep my vote on him. What I am trying to say is: do you really think if he was mafia, he wouldn't defend himself? They have a chat, you know. They can make many excuses as they want, but no one is defending him. Isn't that weird? Well, if he ends up being town, you will be my main suspect ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Newt and do you think his teammates would take the risk to openly defend him? It's Day 1. If one of my scum friends were caught on Day 1, I would bus them rather than risk looking suspicious myself.

Also, I totally return you the same argument: do you really think if he were town, he wouldn't defend himself?

Lastly, if I were scum myself and knew that Nick's innocent, I wouldn't so vehemently push for his elimination, because I'd know that would mean my head falls on Day 2 (maybe even Night 1 if there's a vigilante type of role among us). Suspecting me because I want someone who is objectively suspicious to be eliminated is just silly.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...