So... immoral huh? That was the topic or did I assume wrong?
Yeah nah. No it's not.
Well, it kinda is, since capturing little animals into tiny prison balls and forcing them to battle their brothers and sisters is kinda bad, yes?
Then again, methinks this is a major part of the games since Kanto. What do you mean that's perfectly fine?
Certainly the real world does not have such plots of world domination by an evil team, further motivated by religion. wait!
Okay okay, so you make a bond, and friendship, and challenge the league... yeh that makes up for it. It's not that somebody mutilated a Slowpoke to sell as a delicacy.
Of course we eat meat all the time, so we're cool? I guess we're cool.
They removed the slots though, so... we're not cool. I want to spend my hard earned heritage to black jack and hookers dammit!
I reckon I should make my own game with those two elements. hidden reference
Alright, I've had my fun.
Reborn and the canon pokemon games don't have the same target audience. In order to appeal to the more mature fans who always wished for a challenge, Reborn provides a darker theme, whilst trying not to be too edgy. All of that has already been mentioned above, so it makes no sense to reiterate. However it is important to distinguish between personal expectations and morality. As assumed before, people have a certain way to look at the franchise and Reborn bursts that bubble. it's a depiction of a harsh place to live in, similar to a few real cities. It depicts the underworld of pokemon and that's ok. That's what its aim was. If it's not your cup of tea, you may try something else. But trying to justify your own beliefs by branding the game as 'immoral' is denying your own immaturity. The player is a mere observer in most actions, but even if we were forced to participate in said immoral deeds, there is no harm done, since in-universe it makes sense. We traveled to a region deprived of all class, lived as a hobo for quite a while, and fought against an evil Team from the very beginning, given they tried to kill us before we even started. We still pursue the same goals canon protagonists do, exploit the mechanics of magical animal fights, and forced to take a side fighting against the 'bad guys'.
In my opinion, it's perfecty okay that the game makes you question the behavior of the 'good characters'. They even call you out on it when Charlotte points out that the Meteors are just on the other side and fight for their own ideals. Some character's behaviors are either dumb or extreme, but since it's a fantasy universe, we can allow such people to exist and have pivotal roles in our games for the sake of story progression. Their dialogue has been rewritten and improvements can be made, but that should not be the focus. The game has a lot story-wise, and it does not crumble upon its own weight. But in order to close the debate, the drawbacks of the game do not involve the moral compass the protagonist holds. There are other games with darker themes that force the hero to commit attrocious crimes, yet they don't get such criticism because the source material either does not exist or is about the same. In my opinion, this very transformation is the main 'selling' point of the game.
PS: The Patreon page is a recent addition. The game was not made to make profit, therefore such allegations are baseless.