Jump to content

Eeveelution Hurt/heal


Wolfox

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 510
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, Hooligan said:

No. Vaporeon is the worst design of the eeveelutions. Eevee is a fox, rabbit or something that evolves in a fishcat with weird ears and that thing above the head that looks like a shark. What is the point of a fishcat? In my opinion, they could make a Water-type mammal instead of a fish, because it's impossible for a mammal becoming a fish.

 

I think I'm the only one that have the knowledge to understand why the Vaporeon is ugly.

 

I'm sorry to inform you that you have no taste when it comes to Eeveelutions. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Wolfox said:

even for eeveelutions it's pretty bad (that's counting Umbreon with synchronoise)

Pimpnite is laughing at this.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Chim said:

I'm sorry to inform you that you have no taste when it comes to Eeveelutions. 

Well, I don't like some of the Pokemon like Vaporeon, because they look way too weird.

 

People only gave love to Vaporeon, because it's a Eeveelution. Now, if it was a evolution of a ordinary Pokemon, it would be considered ugly by most of the people. Vaporeon is overrated as hell for that reason. Also, I think that hybrid Pokemon such as Vaporeon, Type: Null, Silvally and other ones that I can't remember, are all ugly. Also, Gen 1 is overrated in General.

 

Do you see that people hate Garbodor from Gen 5 and like Muk from Gen 1? I would say that I disagree with this hate, because Garbodor was a creative work, at least, making a Pokemon that reminds about the trash from New York. And Muk? You can identify the problem of this one in the name. Muk is a pollution Pokemon, too bland, because it's all purple. Gen 1 is illogical, empty, glitched and ugly, and so is Vaporeon.

 

Basically, in my opinion, a blue Floatzel with two big ears would fit way much better for a Eeveelution than Vaporeon, because how the hell a mammal will suffer a mutation to become a fish?

 

I'm sorry if I was rude or if I did something wrong here. You know that I have no intention to offend anyone, I just needed to say about that. It's just that mutation makes absolutely no sense for me.

 

That's all, thanks and sorry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jolteon: 16

Vaporeon: 18

Flareon: 11

Umbreon: 19

Espeon: 21

Leafeon: 14

Glaceon: 21

Sylveon: 17

Directly updated from previous page

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jolteon: 16

Vaporeon: 18

Flareon: 5

Umbreon: 19

Espeon: 23

Leafeon: 14

Glaceon: 21

Sylveon: 17

 

@Hooligan nobody is arguing that gen 1 isn't overrated, granted the hate garbodor to muk comparison is usually one used by Genwunners to "proof" that gen 5 is bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is the same on all generations : somes bad mons and some styled mons.

 

 

Yeah gen 5 has a bunch of " bad " mons ( i mean ridiculous design ) like vanilluxe or garbodor , but on the other hand just look at zoroark or haxorus how beautifull they are. Zoroark is probably one of the best pokemon ever created in term of design imo. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gen 5 had a good number of quality mons. And the Vaniluxe line at least makes some sense in the cannon, as Ice Cream in the pokémon world is based on them. But, can we all agree that both in lore and design Chandelure is the best gen 5 mon? I mean, come on. It's a fucking haunted chandelier (probably got mad at Sia for some reason?).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...