_600.2127531.jpg.f325a90cb4d7f62e4159b41e6b63af1f.jpg)
FairFamily
-
Posts
1520 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Reborn Development Blog
Rejuvenation Development Blog
Starlight Divide Devblog
Desolation Dev Blog
Everything posted by FairFamily
-
Welcome.
-
I finished my first D&D session yesterday. I will also start a log of our adventures in the D&D club. For those interested look here:
-
_600.2127531.thumb.jpg.396f20db3175e08548d3ebd1c45edcf3.jpg)
Does anyone know where I can buy white herbs? I can't buy them in the herb store and haven't found them yet. -
Welcome.
-
@Ice Cream Sand Witch I found a bug an old one that resurfaced regarding minior. Second bug
-
Welcome.
-
This is a nice monday surprice. Thank you ICWS for your dedication and time. You made a good fangame and an amazing experience.
-
Welcome.
-
Welcome.
-
Lightning doesn't strike twice, but for you I make it four.
Spoiler
- Show previous comments 2 more
-
@seki108 You use kaminari attack as fusion material for twin-headed thunder dragon in duelist of the rose? I just use kaminarikozou, way lower dc.
-
-
-
Welcome.
-
Welcome.
-
Welcome.
-
Welcome back.
-
Welcome.
-
Well I'm digging that thunder dragon support. Shame that the OG fusion didn't get any love especially it was once my ace.
-
A Positively Puzzling Proposition Positing a Plethora of Problems
FairFamily commented on Marcello's post in Records
Meh, It could just mean that Marcello wrote an ineffecient algorithm. Still might be interesting to see if I can "beat his score". -
Never has monster hunter disappointed me so much. I finally reached after a hiatus the final battle of the story of mh4u only for it to be a scripted tutorial. Such a waste of hype.
-
Who would win? Five link monsters or one flowery dragon?
Spoiler
-
Welcome to reborn.
-
Welcome to reborn.
-
Welcome.
-
Fun fact, I actually got a warning point for that, don't know how long it lasted, pretty long though. I don't know like I said the image was fine even on the source site. It's just that I could click on the link ofthe image which directed to the site of picture. That site had on top of the picture, pornographic advertisement maybe the person took a link from a site that post images based on links as well, maybe he had a good add blocker.
-
I'm not so sure about this. I sure see the benefit of setting up a setting a system that allows for permanently banning people. However I don't see it being implemented with the current system. The first issue I have is that just as etique based mishaps non-etique mishaps happen as well. Some of the rules aren't clearly specified so people might get permanent warning points because they misinterpreted the rules. Second sometimes people are a bit innattentive and make mistake that involve infracting content. To give two examples: the first is of someone who posted an innocent image which source link redirected to a site containong phonographic advertisements. The second one is of a danganronpa video where one bear is licking the face of another bear. With this video was quoted "Lick me harder, daddy". In both cases the content got removed which I assume was for inappropriate content both caused by inattentiveness. These are both cases that are bound to happen from to time and will result in people racking permanent warning points until they inevitably reach the ban hammer even though the person just made some mistakes. Also I feel from the examples and the implemented system that you are using a cannon to shoot a fly: a mismatch between solution and problem. The system punishes single infractions while your examples clearly indicate multiple infractions. So why not simply build a system based on how many times a person racks up multiple warning points? Something like: -if you build up 7 warning points 2 times in a year (365 day time period) or 3 times 5 warning points in a year you get banned.
_600.3282634.thumb.jpg.110efa0fe4ef9b291e2b6881c1cbe2e8.jpg)
