Well some of you may remember a few weeks ago I posted a Part 1 of 3 series on questions and my two cents of life, and that part of it was the questions on gender identification and non-binary individuals. Well now I come with another part to my series, and it falls well in line with one of the other two things I wanted to talk about, and maybe question and delve into for Reborn. So those members living in America, and those who have been browsing the forums as of late, may have realized that homosexual marriage is now recognized as legal in the United States, and some of the other events occurring within the last few years in America more along the lines of civil rights.
What I now come with is the question of whether that was really a right decision or not. I know you guys might start spouting off that, yes indeed, it was a smart idea, but I'd like to open it up for a discussion. I mean, in my own personal opinion, I honestly don't really care about that case all that much, but then again that comes from the perspective of a non-homosexual. When I saw the headline on a newspaper announcing that the case had passed through, I sort of shrugged it off after the initially mild surprise. I don't think it will really mean anything in the next few days, but maybe in the next few years or decades in America there might be some sort of grand poobah holiday declared in recognition of that act. Then again maybe I'm overthinking it, because there is no real holiday I can think of that nationally recognized in America other than Martin Luther King Day, which involves civil rights. There really was no holiday for recognizing the 13th Amendment (U.S Constitution Amendment that freed all slaves from forced servitude), or Roe v. Wade (Recognized U.S Supreme Court case concerning abortion, and more along the lines of rights to privacy rather than abortion).
I read somewhere that someone mentioned the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in one of those gay marriage threads, and I decided to study up on it, because I never really read the Declaration before. I mean I know it sounds selfish, but there are sometimes, where I wanna say: "Fuck civil rights." Now I don't loathe America for the choices that my forefathers made, because there ain't jack shit I can do about it. One thing I feel like I might hear about from loud-mouthed gay couples is how they're proud of their homosexuality and whatnot, maybe disrupting me from what I'm doing. Now I'd wanna pimp-slap someone like that, and all of the sudden I guess it's a hate crime. But in my defense, it's more because they wouldn't shut the hell up rather than me "hating" their group.
When I looked at the Declaration, the first thing that caught my eye was how similar it looked when compared to certain American laws and principles that I am very familiar with. For instance, Article 1 sounds almost like the drafters just looked at the American Declaration of Independence, cut the sliver out of all men being created equal without certain inalienable rights, and placed it on the document, after some revising scrutinity. To me, human and civil rights are more on the lines of privileges. Also I noticed the Declaration was drafted by the United Nations, which is spearheaded in America (New York City to be exact). The Declaration was made by a collection of countries which a majority of democracies. Still, not every country on Earth is a democracy. To me, human and civil rights are a nicetie - like if you were to go to McDonalds and you get 7 chicken nuggets on your 6-piece meal.
This is where I come to the actual question I have at hand. Doesn't the Universal Declaration seem like a subtle American imposition on the world? I mean, I think it's immoral because of the question of philosophy, which is to have an open mind. Now when having an open mind, you have to consider each side to an argument. For instance, not every governmental system is absolute perfection. Each has their own flaws and shining benefits. But I think the Universal Declaration is kind of stupid, because everyone is different on their system of laws, codes, social mores, folkways, and the like. For instance, if the ancient Greek city-state of Sparta were to exist today, with it's old traditions, it might be shunned by the world, because they fucked with the kids, the women, the men, and the slaves. They had a solid idea that if you were not strong enough, you were thrown out, because you couldn't carry on. Basically the world should be a bountiful harvest, not a tit we can suckle off of, and I think Sparta had that philosophy down to a practical "science".
I don't think one should be born into the world with rights guarenteed to them throughout their life, rather they should earn them, or have X number of chances before your rights/privileges are taken away. Men (and women) cannot always be created equal. Some are born with different skin color. Some are born into worlds apart with infrastructure and social classes. In some extreme cases, some are quite literally born lesser because of birth defects.
But hey, that's just my questions, as well as my two cents. Everybody's got an opinion, and if there's one civil right I particularly enjoy, it's the privilege to speak my mind when I feel needed. I'd like to hear what Reborn has to say about something like this, and maybe help expand our views on something like this.