Alaris

I won't explain every one of them, but here is my little list: - Lego (including Bionicle) toys: especially egypt, harry potter 1-2 and orient expedition sets, as well as the bionicle you could turn into an sphere (I can't remember their name right now). - Card Captor Sakura anime - Digimon anime - Pokemon crystal and -especially- pokemon ruby videogames - Yoshi's island videogame So... that's my childhood in a nutshell haha

I'm a biologist. In my case, it was what I wanted to do since I was like... four years old. Buuut it appears that it wasn't the best choice to do, anyway ^^U. I mean, I was sure that I wanted to study biology, but after so many years in college I discovered that what I really like is geology. Of course, I finished the B.Sc. in biology and I graduated, but then I took one extra year in geology and I absolutely loved it. This year I took a M.Sc. in palaeontology, which is, so to speak, between the two. What I'm really saying here is that one can make mistakes even when there's apparently no doubt on what to do. So if you don't know, don't worry. As someone told you before in this topic, just talk to people and see what you'd like to do. Or simply try to study something you like or are good at. I think that it's a pity when people study and work on something they don't really like because it was the easier path. I see that your three main options are very different of one another. That is good, it means that your interests are quite rich. I've got friends studying engineering, I would recommend doing it only if you're very good at maths, and can cope with great pressure (some of my friends sleep 3-4 h a day during the whole academic course, although obviously it may depend on the university you're going to). I can't give you any advice on accounting or writing ú_ù

Hi! Well, that guy was not my boyfriend (I wish!), but just a friend. And about the distance thing, we now live more than 300 km away with a sea separating us, so I can somewhat relate to that. But what I wanted to say, basically, is that trying to forget someone by attempting to cut ties with him has hurt me more than going and telling him the truth (I've had both experiences). Let me explain: So--- like eight years ago, I had a crush on who was, at that time, my best friend (I tend to get crushes on friends; not all my friends, of course, I've only been attracted to 2 of them in my life, which will be the cases I'll be explaining now). Well, to sum up, after about 5 years of being very close, even being flatmates in college, I concluded that he didn't feel the same way towards me (which became especially apparent when he finally got a girlfriend). So I decided to leave the flat we were sharing and never talk to him again (he would ignore me anyway, by that time), and, of course, I never told him anything about the crush I had had on him. And now, 3 years later, I still wake up crying and thinking abouth him some days, and I think I wouldn't be able to confront him face-to-face. I think that this situation is not healthy, really. On the other hand, there's the case I explained in the previous post. I must admit that I was lucky (or I had a crush on him because of his kindness) when he told me that he didn't feel the same way. But really, having a definitive answer is much better. I think about him every day, but not in an obsessive, self-destructive way, just because I really care about him and I feel very thankful of how he managed the situation. Before confessing, I would have terrible anxiety and depression, now I feel much better. That was my experience on the matter. I know that it's not 100% relatable to Candy's case, but I see some common points there. I think that it should be judged if that person can manage a confession (I mean, you knew him, right?) and, if he is sensible enough to provide you with a potential answer that would calm you down. Of course, if you think that that guy will be a bas****, you will have to try and forget him eventually, and I know it's easier said than done. Hope it helps!

I'm in a similar situation, in a sense. I'll try to summarize my experience, just in case it might be of some use to you. During last year, I got a crush on a classmate (in fact, it's explained somewhere in a post in these forums...). I was the new guy there, and we became friends very quickly (which is quite odd because it's usually hard for me to make new friends, at least that fast). Probably because I had somewhat idealized him, I misunderstood many banal comments thinking that, in fact, he felt the same way towards me. Every few days I would try to start a messenger chat with him, but he always answered very briefly, giving no options to keep talking. Even though I knew that my odds to success were very scarce, I finally confessed to him. And it was the best decision I could have made. He obviously told me that he liked girls and could never correspond me, but he did it in a most charming way, making me feel much better. Then we didn't really talk to each other until his birthday (1 year after), in which I finally decided to get back in touch with him. I wanted to do so because since I had declared myself the situation had become quite odd. He was very receptive and we talked for hours, even more than before. Now we talk from time to time. I admit that I haven't completely moved on, but I'm so much better now. My point here: if you're not going to see him again, why don't you tell him how you feel? Getting a "no" (and maybe being just friends from them on) is much better than being on edge for god knows how much more time.

Thank you very much!! I managed to remove it. It appears that the code number of the map I was using was the same of a Reborn map with a certain BattleBack that was linked to a field. Where do you link the BattleBacks to specific fields?

Hi, Today I was making my first game, so to make it easier I somewhat edited Reborn. One of the problems I've been encountering is that there appear to be certain field effects assigned to certain tiles. I would like to remove those, but I've checked the tile attributes and I can't seem to find anything... Does anybody happer to know the mechanism by which a specific tile gets linked to a field effect? Thanks in advanced!

Hi! So I wanted to know if any of you knew how to make a password with the RPGMakerXP. I know how to make numerical ones, but this time I wanted to introduce text... Do you know if it is possible? I googled it but I only find tutorials for RPG VX, which don't work for me... I just want to make the player introduce a text, if it coincides with a specific answer, have a result (like a conditional branch); if not, then nothing. Thanks very much!!

Yeah, her mega is going to be scizor as it's her ace. I think there's little room for discussion here, now then the other members, we know excadrill, aegislash and skarmory... I'd bet for empoleon and metagross

Squall from FF8. His personality is a copy of mine. I have never felt so identified with any other character before.

You should post it here: http://www.rebornevo.com/forum/index.php?/topic/23098-e16-minor-errors/

As others said --we're scientifically animals. The thing is: the scientific method of classification is highly arbitrary. I suppose many of you might be familiar with it, but let me explain it for the ones who don't. In extant forms of life, the "species" are supposed to be the only "real" taxonomic category. That is, a group of populations with the capacity (real or possible) of interbreeding, giving result to a viable offspring. Ok, that's a species. The rest of categories (genus, family, order, class, KINGDOM, and all the others inbetween) are artificial. They supposedly represent monophyletic (=same common ancestor) groups, but, in reality, evolution does not provide clear cutting points. Therefore, humans cut them and make the groups according to our beliefs. You think it's not true? Let me show you two cases. First of all, the most typical one: birds vs. reptiles. We all know birds are dinosaurs. Recent research has shown that most of the dinosaurs were metabolically (and perhaps ethologically) more related to birds than reptiles. However, we put them in the phyllum Reptilia. Following that line of thinking, birds ARE reptiles. But we humans have set them apart for our convenience. Extant birds are different from extant reptiles, so it's easy to separate them. See where I am going? Just as reptiles are a paraphyletic group (=not all the descendants within it), mammals could be too. And humans could be a new class? phyllum? or even kingdom?. Us, and only us, make the definitions and establish the boundaries between higher taxonomic categories. Therefore, the argument "it's a scienticit fact" is NOT valid. Scientific classification is highly subjective. Another example: the species in the genus Homo. That's the worst example of human ego I can think of. Many of them are the same, with no bigger variations than among other mammalian species. All the anthropologists just want to name "their hominid", and therefore, every f****** chunk of bone is a new species. That is an example of subjectivity even at (palaeo)species level. There is, in fact, a study that concludes that in palaeontology, the number of characters correlates to the number of species. That is, if a lineage has more traits to allow differentiation, more species will be made, even if they were not real. Here you go: more subjectivity. Okay, now that the scientific argument has no validity on this issue, we can start discussing. There will not be facts, but opinions, which I think were the primary goal of this topic. I personally think that we ARE animals. We are similarly constituted, and share a certain way of "thinking". But if someone argued for empathy to be a valid taxonomic character to separate two kingdoms, I would listen. Well, sorry for my English. I'm usually more inspired but today I'm feeling quite odd.

Okay, I'll try!!

Alaris @Chesto berry Fighting/Rock Ability: Own tempo EVs: 252 Attack/252 Speed/4 HP Nature: Lonely -Low kick -Counter -Rock smash -Revenge

oookay... so far, the fields were challenging now THIS is scary ...and I feel that we are going to battle Lin in it...

You want Reborn not to be difficult?

That's the point! And I really like it! haha

Currently at university too, studying palaeontology.

I see. Thanks, I'll try!!

Thank you very much!!! I'll try and see how it turns out. Could you suggest me any specific movepool for bisharp? Haha I really hate Gardevoir... for some reason Why? ...

Hi!! So-- let me explain. I would like to ask you if you could suggest me a pokemon that worked well, at least, with my "ace". ...aaand that's a Gallade. I know it's not an amazing pokemon but it's my favourite. That's the moveset it has: Swords Dance Close Combat Leaf Blade Psycho Cut Justified / Adamant / 252 attack / 2 defense / 252 speed I'll be looking forward to your suggestions. Thank you very much in advanced!

oh I NEVER say (or write) lol!

Lucky guy why not Jokes aside, Ame, thanks for the video, but as others said, there's no need to justify it!! It'll take what it'll take!! But I'm also dying for playing it

But where did you get the actual order of leaders from? Because, following the rules, there would be no need for us battling them in order, really. Without any specific order, it is impossible to deduce it. Your theory is not necessarily right: -You have supposed that Ciel, Amaria, Terra and Charlotte are a cluster of 4 leaders in the tier. -But, consider this scenario: if the order were Ciel-Terra-Charlotte-rest of leaders, including Amaria; Fern could have missed Charlotte and still could have been able to face Amaria, since she could be 1, 2 or 3 leaders ahead of Charlotte... For example, the odrer Ciel-Terra-Charlotte-Adrienn-Hardy-Amaria could also be possible with the premises Ame gave us.

I don't think so... we didn't get Corey's or Kiki's badge because they died before giving it to us, but we already have Julia's...