Jump to content

How ToTroll Ame or Any Other Forum Member!


Azeria

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How to troll ame?

Man, stand aside kids. let me do my thing

for starters....

1376458_677243568963324_1073291791_n.jpg

946568_380906768684581_1967750992_n.jpg5vVtSHT.gif

LlFAZfS.jpg

Cv6WXBA.gifFNQ7Aer.gifIS0i35v.jpgALuuat2.gif

And then we have these four little ones, which prompted her to write an extensive and highly amusing piece on how fallacious they are

487508_569741769713505_781167456_n.jpg

meanwhile did you know that the first one is invalid because spiders are not only nonmonogamous and also don't have any form of marriage in the first place but spider females eat their mates after reproduction
FURTHERMORE
THE third image implies that the spider has finished his work and neglects the fact that spiders also have negative properties in their ownsets. It also implies the fact that spiders can read. Which being that they do not have the adequate sensory stores nor the empircal value in their conceivable lifespan to establish passable pattern recognition NOR THE REGION OF THE BRAIN IN WHICH TO STORE THAT INFORMATION
The fourth image implies that the spider has some kind of understanding of possession of property and further the knowledge to understand exactly what constitutes a house.
It also implies that the person to whom he 'speaks' is the house owner which is fallacious in itself
Moreover, being that spiders make their own habitats out of webs they would not have any conceptual understanding of furniture, or the need to have a polish for it.
Further, even presuming that WHAT IF THEY DID have this knowledge, there's then no reason that they shouldn't be cogniscent of what a can of bug spray is.
In fact they should not assume bug spray is furniture polish but rather the other way around because the trauma associated with teh spray is more likely to, even assuming they di dhave viable centers of pattern recognition, inflict traumatic stress on the spider just by the trigger of seeing a can similarly organised in its mental schema around the spray.
The second image is inherently fallacious in that it assumes the spider is doing these things with the intent of pleasing the human. As we know, this is untrue, spiders do these things as a natural part of their lives, and to insinuate and attempt to guilt a real human on the basis of this fictional spider is a politcal spin no less scandalous than every other episode of the O'Reily Zone. It also, again, misimplies that the spider would understand what a book is without actually having any reason to, and ignoring the OBVIOUS threat to its own life. In essence it makes the subject appear to have the experiences not of an individual, but of a species, which is poor writing on the compiler's part
WHICH BRINGS ME TO MY NEXT POINT
THIS SPIDER IS SPEAKING ENGLISH
or at least it is implied to be doing so
AS WE ALL KNOW SPIDERS DO NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO SPEAKI ENGLISH
although they do have some rather interesting abilities like did you know they discovered a tarantual in the amazon that has wings and can fly
THEY ALSO CANNOT PRINT TEXT OR PROCESS VERBAL COMMUNICATION IN THE SAME WAY HUMANS CAN AND EVEN IF THEY DID THEY DO NOT HAVE THE PHYSICAL MUSCLES EITHER TO AUDIALLY COMMUNICATE OR WRITE AND/OR TYPE THE TEXT
THEREBY THE ENTIRE PREMISE ON WHICH THIS IMAGE SET IS BASED IS FALSE
AND FURTHER
THESE IMAGES ARE IMPLIED TO BE TAKING PLACE INSIDE SOMEBODY'S HOUSE
BUT IF YOU LOOK IN THE BACKGROUND
THAT IS CLEARLY
AN EXTERIOR LEAF
AS IN THIS
ETNIRE
SET
IS
FABRICATED
FALSE
FALLACIOUS
BULLSHIT
AND AS SUCHJ
I SHALL SQUISH ALL THE SPIDERS THAT I SO DESIRE
FULL. STOP.

another interesting topic which gets her ranting going is....

...dinosaur erotica?

(16:01:54) +Amethyst: Firstly from a psychological standpoint it would be mentally unhealthy to foster a fetishistic attraction to dinosaur erotica in a zeitgeist where even sexual intercourse with merehouse pets is frowned upon. The resulting dynamic can cause significant stress on the part of the individual in the emotional shame resulting from being attracted to the dinosaur in question couple with the cultural pressure and stigma surrounding the general concept of bestiality. Of course, this analysis assumes that the subject in question is indeed capable of feeling arousal as a result of the dinosaur-erotica stimulus. If this is not the case than while the former analysis is invalidated the new arguement becomes that the subject is then being edxposed to undesirable stimuli which may not only be of no use to the individual, but flat out trauamatizing if presented in a strong enough context. Psychological implications aside, the economic effects of supporting this industry amplify the aforementioned consequences on a societal level. By reading or especially purchasing the book in question the economic demand factor of the item is raised thereby suggesting to the writers and publishers that there is a larger market for the item than there probably realistically is. This is problematic for them as, in artificially inflating the demand for a product they waste resources trying to meet the supply (granted we are dealing with just one transaction on a micro level but as with all sociological data we must assume that any given situation is not solely isolated). It is also problematic for the consumers as there will then be a larger range of socially unacceptable (and thereby psychologically toxic) dinosaur erotica available and potentially forced on them to choose from. As a side effect, the bad-dragon website's sales might go up... Anyway, finally, there are ethical implications in consideration as well, as, firstly, it is questionable on a base level to include dinosaurs in human reprorductive acts as there is nothing neurologically to suggest that there is any evolutionary boon to be warranted from the copulation of a dinosaur with a human. Secondly, it is questionable to any humans involved or portrayed in the making of the story. For instance, the title of the item in question references 'Christie' who we can assume is a human female, and, while without actually reading the aforementioned literature it is difficult to say before, it can be assumed based on the notions surrounding the dominant, predatory nature of the T-Rex and the classically submissive female in modern pornography, that this human female is violated in some way by the dinosaur. If this is not the case with this article, should the demand for dinosaur erotica increase, there will certainly be such an instance of that scenario. If and when it is created then it serves to further cement the role of the female in modern society as a sexual object, reinforcing the patriarchal notions of male dominance and female objectification. Finally, there is the undeniable fact that dinosaurs are, in the first place, quite extinct, which makes all of this very silly in the first place.

She actually had a blog on the old site a long long time ago before we were forced to switch hosts, and she actually had a good list of things which vexed her. I only wish I could remember them off the top of my head.

Edited by Noivy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How to troll ame?

Man, stand aside kids. let me do my thing

for starters....

1376458_677243568963324_1073291791_n.jpg

946568_380906768684581_1967750992_n.jpg5vVtSHT.gif

LlFAZfS.jpg

Cv6WXBA.gifFNQ7Aer.gifIS0i35v.jpgALuuat2.gif

And then we have these four little ones, which prompted her to write an extensive and highly amusing piece on how fallacious they are

487508_569741769713505_781167456_n.jpg

another interesting topic which gets her ranting going is....

...dinosaur erotica?

She actually had a blog on the old site a long long time ago before we were forced to switch hosts, and she actually had a good list of things which vexed her. I only wish I could remember them off the top of my head.

There's that one pokemon that Ame hates. No need to mention it's name...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Support Squad

Ok, several points

1: Gender. Fuck Y'all i'm an Elf, ain't nobody seen my genitalia so none o' you gets to decide dat

2: Spiders. They can make webs in places other than my house, if they choose to do so in my territory, then i shall defend aforementioned territory. Nature.

3: Trolling: You don't troll, you succeed.

4: Grudges:

5: I just wanted a fifth point

Edited by DobbyTheElf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That...is actually not a bad idea. Too bad the namechangers are out of stock. Tacps, something's waiting~

In case it hasn't been noticed by my title, I've embraced it at this point so trolling me with it wouldn't be trolling. I wouldn't mind it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...