The electoral college is an undemocratic group, created under the false pretext that it offers protection to scarcely populated states from denser areas. An arbitrary change in preference for the next president would merely convince the people of the redundancy of the electoral college institution.
"Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others", according to Winston S. Churchill. That does not mean the system itself is inherently flawed, rather the voterbase comprises of large numbers of uninformed, uneducated, and biased people who often refute logical arguments by turning to tradition and/or personal religious beliefs. The root of the problem is the lack of pluralism, which indirectly stems from the voting system that leads to extreme polarization, and regards a third-party vote as a wasted one. Thus, electoral systems applied elsewhere (that being mainly Europe), in which a coalition of parties to form a government and an absolute proportional system to elect politicians helps alleviate the extreme facets of such issues. Change does not only reflect in the President-elect's personal judgement, but on the power their peers have on legislative affairs.
That said, no man rules alone. As Chase has pointed out, the choice of representatives in the cabinet is at best alarming. Names such as Bannon, Carson, Guillany and Sessions need no extensive background check to verify their unsuitability. The statements of a neurosurgeon that defy facts on neurology further strengthened by recent metanalyses, simply to promote their own (religious/ideological) agenda, should eliminate such a person from candidacy in a position of power, not to mention the ministry of education. The fact that USA dodged that bullet not because of the President-elect's change in mind, but Carson's personal denial of the position, irks me personally, as it shows complete lack of judgement and total disregard to the scientific and medical community.
To further elaborate on that, and allow the topic to get a bit sidetracked from the course it seemed to take the last 2 pages (and because it seems the discussion is about to go in circles), I believe it's of essence to shed more light upon the ministers and secretaries (aka Keys of Power) with whom Trump is forming his government. As stated before, his inexperience on the field will leave him inable to form a central management in which he will supervise every decision where the ministers simply counsel him, so understanding the people he will base his 'service' on will give us a better understanding of "what really comes next", not only in terms of foreign affairs, but mainly in regards to the changes in the internal system.