Shamitako

(03:32:32) Inumuta joined the channel. (03:32:34) +Emerald: I LACK WISDOM (03:32:35) Onyx: Stays four letters too (03:32:35) [Excalibur]DangerDan left the channel. (03:32:48) +Inumuta: Somehow, that doesn't surprise me. (03:33:00) Onyx: Tru dat (03:33:01) +Emerald: I like how kaito comes back and that is the first thing he sees *Places the dunce cap upon Godot's head*

<is Ame's cat <<is pretty sure that makes her automatically the winner <<<is actually just blustering and being silly <is still Ame's cat

Meow

Oh, right, yes, I actually knew that (I've been looking into hormone therapy the last couple weeks) Actually that reminds me... On a side note, the vocabulary choices in this post are exemplary and I love them

I'm just going to point back to the US Civil War, where trying to compromise ended up with a third of the country having their voices shoved in a hole (nowadays basically everyone sees slavery as evil, but that's largely because of how things went back then) Compromises aren't bad, but they tend to end badly when people have conflicting morals And, um, there's no law against making religious based rules. There's a law preventing the government from restricting religion and vice versa (though people tend to misinterpret that) It's there because when we split off from Britain the king controlled the church and was using said control to manipulate the people through religion (similar to the catholic church in the [insert timeframe I kinda forgot here]) It has actually less to do with the church manipulating the government as it does the government manipulating the church Think of religion like the press, we keep them separate from the government so the government can't tell people what to think (of course we have government based education instead, so yeah...) And of course the church isn't allowed to pass laws, but that doesn't mean people can't suggest laws with a religious basis in mind. If the people wanted it, we could make it so eating pork was illegal (well not really, but it wouldn't be because of the whole "separation of church and state" thing)

There's a difference between doing or not doing something, and actually considering it wrong. If a country was predominantly Jewish and voted in a law that eating pork was illegal I'd find it silly, and if I lived there I would dislike not getting to eat pork, but I wouldn't get upset and say "you shouldn't bring you religious beliefs into this [because my nonreligious beliefs are clearly correct]" And religion mayn't be the same thing as morals, but most people base their morals in their religion. There's a lot of "I don't care what your god says, I don't believe in them) To a lot of people, what their god says means everything about how they live their lives and form their opinions. So you can't really force them to take that out of their major decisions. I'd see that be like asking me to take my transgenderism out of my opinion on feminism and gaming (the biggest core feature of who I am, and a major issue with me right now that it happens to affect) Disclaimer #2: Personally I'm mostly agnostic

>don't bring religion into politics So basically because you don't believe something other people who do believe it shouldn't allow it to affect their decisions? I hear this one a lot and find it endlessly presumptuous. It basically says that unless you agree with something, it needs to not affect you. This is why countries have democracies in the first place, because not everyone is going to agree on everything. Basing your beliefs on a religious foundation shouldn't immediately invalidate them I'm certainly not going to tell you not to bring your lack of religion into politics If I'm allowed to sound a bit redundant, just because I don't find something moral or correct doesn't make it my place to decide the laws on it (well, not totally, again, democracies are a thing for a reason. I'm not going to forgo voting, just not going to get upset if something doesn't go my way) Disclaimer: Also, I know nothing of governments outside the US, so you'll have to forgive me if I seem a bit naive, since I am >_<

No apologies necessary, and I'm sorry if my tone made you think they were ^^ You asked a question because you didn't know, so I answered

Um no, I am definitely not sterile (yet) I can still get a girl pregnant if I want (though admittedly I'm still legally male) Not all trans people get sex reassignment surgeries. Especially trans guys, a lot of whom just get the breasts trimmed down (though many do also get their reproductive bits ripped out, and actually I think both of those technically count as SRSs) There's plenty of trans people who could still very easily have kids EDIT: Also, won't be signing, sorry. Might technically be allowed to, but I don't feel it's my right to try to change things in Finland. What the people of Finland want is what the law should reflect, whether I personally feel it moral or not

All aboard the Showdown train! Choo-choo! *Makes stupid whistle blowing hand motions with her arm*

What's wrong with wearing extremely little in low temperatures? owo And thanks Hildra ^^ (Also you are part of "you guys" <3)

As it happens, I built it for pushing. I built way more AD than was necessary there. Bots don't know how to push, so I built to do it myself so I wouldn't lose. Though I picked Lizard over Wraith for the passives, and looking back on that don't think it was really worth it (SotEL is kind of a slow thing, and Akali is all about burst >_<) Also *Indicates Smite* JG of course

Okay, so, basically insta-killing all the enemies is fun. Too bad I can't make her immune to turrets (custom beginner bots BTW)

. Well I haven't been about on PO much lately, but sounds pretty annoying. I have no issues with Showdown. I've been told their main server is really shitty, but that kinda sounds pretty much the same as PO My only real issue is that it would be a browser thing (...Which is indicated as a poro XP) I like having PO be all separate-like from everything else