Paul25

Arguments against scumlean: Did my vote matter a lot? For clarity's sake, does it mean that an another vote is going to eliminate Nick? Wait, does it even meant that Nick is unwilling to get a vote on himself just for he have to deal with some significant stuffs? May or maynot be. Idk. I thought we have the latitude to place your vote on whomever we suspect. All in all, it's not necessarily true that joining a other bw will result in scum-ish perception. In fact, I find your that slashed text suspicious too by proposing us not to move without any info. Why so? Is it because that there's every prospectual possibility of lynching a town or is it a plan to detain us? Eh, enough questions to argue that scumlean. Fine, very well let's suppose that we should not join a hunch based bw to prove ourself an opportunist trying to place an easy mafia sort of vote. So why is your seconder joining your bw by agreeing with you? Since I commited something amiss so should he follow my footstep too? Ig that enough's arguments to prove my innocence. In case it's not (since it could very well be a fallacy or Smth similar) never mind. You may do whatever you all think is moral. Whatever, IDC not If all the players determine to execute me. However, bear in mind that it'd be just like any other loss especially for towns.

All round chaos ensues. Venus' hunch based on weird texts is better than nothing at least. Thus, I'm gonna press on with it. Vote: NickCrash Bean's kidding us BTW. I recommend BeAn to visit the server trip down lane smh. Refer to either Dive or Lia's post containing the link.

Huh, Bean!???????????? Lol, It's hilarious to see bean's play NGL.

BTW, I don't will to follow the footsteps of RNG god so I may excuse myself to place my vote unless we ascertain something better in some way.

Jw, whom do I vote. Eh, it's day 1, I thought we'll have n1 at the beginning. Anyway, so we are asked to nominate a player as a court member on this very phase through pm. kk understood. But, I'm unable to apprehend why Amine placed his vote publicly.

Understood, so Lia's notions are that there's no course of action committed by maf to prove her hypothetically suspect; Interesting answer therefore IG she's innocent. Sailboat's indepth analysis is consistent to some extent btw. Whoops, I'm countered. My assumptions may be wrong in the long run. Jw, whether we'll be sure that Soso is innocent or not after guilty Roswell's execution. I can sense that Bean is quite strange like always and shall continue to be unreliable so implicitly he's a possible suspect this time too. Disclose: ?!!?!! Disclosing that would be a cool idea. Also, I can observe that Roswell being potential mafia, is unconscious of the recruiter role. Probably, his group is not having that role.

Hey players, please regard the proclamation of Amine. He sounds genuine in his claim and is in a serious tone and apparently concerned and is trying to contribute towards scum hunting so IG it's safe to assume that his claim is alright of course unless he follows the footstep of Knight and Purpleicada jk lol Let's proceed ahead then: Vote: Roswell Relying on evidence is better than making evidence less assumptions right? Idk this is proved quite wrong many times and I yet can't restrict myself not to rely on it. Gotta read beforehand occurrences kek.

Venus' thoughts: noticing, the game getting started, he goes ahead and possibly determines who he should vote for. Amidst, he counters Lia by proclaiming that she is openly stating herself as non-town. However, he in turn gets counter by his own statement when she finds the misconception behind his statement. Later on, he audaciously defines that he is a regular townie. It's probable that realizing this as an opportune moment, a scum among ourselves decided to eliminate him. It even implies IMO that they wanted to trap Lia who is a town. Besides, it can be equally possible after considering the fact that Venus determination was to elect Ali as Mayor, someone felt IG Bean resented it and killed Venus. why am I typing the views part by part?

Bad news for town: Venus, a town ally has been indefinitely eliminated by a certain mafia group. May his soul rip.

Observations: In accordance to the role report, Mr. Hyde possesses two faces. One is evil and the other non-evil. Jw, whether there are two Mr. Hyde are not kek. New issue comes to light: OwO, Bean declares Lykos as Mafia and acts as a Catalyst by voting Lia. Heh, another hunch vote and instinctive declaration.

Omg, Soso believes in divine right theory of Mayor smh. Mr. Hyde.

@Psychic Bean Sheep We never said that we are too blind to see the normal sized texts through our naked eyes lmao.

/me burns with fury. Never to trust Mr. Knighty, the false claimer again!!!!! :outrage: :enrage: /me outbursts I pledge not to follow blindly any evidence henceforth. I accuse myself for this embarrassed loss for townies. I'm not going to spare Knighty in next game Will no one tell me that why the heck when I trust a player, he turns out to be an evil? I'm gonna not, never trust any player any day. I'll follow and detect the tune of the text like what Alaris' did to determine a suspect. Gg all BG to me . Dishonesty paved the way for you to win kek!!!!! Wp, mafs my compliments to all of you for have becoming the dishonest-god this time. Thanks to the host for hosting a riddle based mafia game. It taught me a great lesson besides those noteworthy riddle tfw you resolve a riddle when towns lose

My choice goes to the first ever played mafia game in Reborn: Stranded: A Mafia game, I realize that this is my favourite game which not only assisted us in building up our interest in all other mafia game, but paved the way for wide-ranging mafia community in the server. I'll participate in this season anniversary mafia game!!!!

I overlooked something b4 and I find this comment noteworthy: ''Of course for you Paul is town because he is your mafia ally'' Sincere Lykos wouldn't have stated it for it's known to him how many times Paul had proved his dishonesty in mafia game.:p /me shakes his head Oh no, Either You misunderstood it or I typed something which conveyed a dif meaning. I meant, your defense have no role to play against a evidence proving you as scum. Nullifying knight's claim is injustice. Given we disregard his claim, b4 we must have a pure evidence countering his claim. Also, you seem to have nothing consistent implicitly proving that as a mere false blame on your shoulder. Yes I'm conscious about it. But what makes me think you as mafia every time especially when you defend yourself non-stop from accusation ever since you have broken my trust on you back in back to basics. (where you manipulated us with your lies) I'm not willing to commit the same mistake I've performed b4. Forgive me, If you're sincerely stating yourself as town this time. I'm too worried to put my vote on Knight considering the bad consequence. However, I assure you that If I'm wrong this time, I'm gonna remember this nice lesson.

Kek Alaris continues to distrust me. Flashback of a certain game where he shot me. Glory Imma perceived as scum for inconsistent reason. NGL, when I second someone, defend him/her/xyr and join their bw (if any) I'm automatically considered to be scum. On the contrary, when I remain neutral and act indecisive, I'm regarded as scum. smh, I don't get which road to choose. Two roads diverged in mafia game and sorry I couldn't travel each of them coincidentally. My statement as to why I'm lynching Lykos: 1. Knight's claim on Lykos is unable to be disregarded no matter what. 2. Lykos' constant defend serves no sense here when there's a claim on him. Besides, I have been many a time bamboozled by his innocence.

Final vote: Lykos

Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. So, Mafs could someway or the other get an insight to what they should do to obtain killing in night and accordingly may achieve their desired goals which will be eased up once they know the hidden mechanism. IMO we should not reveal this so early especially when we're unsure whether it'll benefit us or prove to be advantageous for them. Hereby, Cancel (disclosure): Mafia Since, there's nothing written about how to cancel Mafia rules' disclosure or I overlooked the additional specific rules info, therefore I'm using that format for the undisclosure of hidden mafia rules. And instead casting to reveal a specific role: Disclose: Mr. Hyde Hyde = hidehide, is it a disguiser. I'm curious to know about it.

Vote: Bean (My gut's determined to vote him due to unleashment of bizzarre Town-ish vibes) Disclose: Mafia

OwO, here's the commencement of the game. Now, Let's go and elect a desirable mayor. No, I don't get who to elect for the present moment. OK, then how about the additional role disclosing or mafia's hidden norm disclosing votes? :thinking: But b4 that, what's the necessary motive and benefit of revealing mafia's hidden rules rather than mafia role? I'm too dumb to understand kek

And feels dead Bean xD

Gl Bean. Better late than never where never = I

No actually we all are helping the mafs. Not only you. Towns are disintegrated in this game NGL. Very well, I have a pang hopelessness about losing the game. ....Another intuitive evidence of relying on the tone of texts. Other players are totally quite neutral. Gg Mafs, you win. Potential mafs: Mega, Lykos, purple or Lia. Yet, I can't see the coherent motive behind untrusting evidences when towns are at stake. Nor can I comprehend the apt motive of untrusting Knight and trust Lykos. Kek , these mind cum mafia games.

Whoa! Cool new functions yay! Noice

I would like to venture my views regarding the current instances. Evidences are what towns look for in a mafia game. Since they are the uninformed minority, therefore they mostly rely on evidences. Not trusting testimony of other just can make one more suspicious. Also, in this game there's nothing stating that What we can't solve can't be solved by others. Yes, indeed I agree that there are certain moments when they apparently are fake. But, we can never disregard any sort of evidence from my outlook. In fact, they're less likely to come false. Sorry, I don't agree with you and Alaris for I have certain misgivings about untrusting an evidence. However, I'd have probably agreed to it had there been a role which appears to be a scum when inspected. Heh, it may sound weird for you and others that why the heck I'm not trusting a trustworthy Lykos. See, I used to trust you a lot back awhile but after you duped us back in back to basics and other prior games, I'm superstiously hesitant to have my faith on you. OK, So on the basis of you and your supporter's philosophy we should not trust on evidences easily. Oh, that means should we trust the investigations for a person and disregard the investigation against a person? Eh, idk what's happened with you all. You all are too prone to change your mind smh and me too. :/ Alaris is a town marked player by another town. However, I think he is just acting Anti-Town and helping the mafs. Yes, I can be wrong too and I have zero experiences about devising a hunch like others do :/ Yay, My arguments all suck :thumbsup: and it can very well be wrong. Go ahead and do whatever you think and wanna do especially towns. Going with Hunch or some sort of hypothesis is a better way to proceed. It's for sure at this pace, we r gonna lose for sure. Yay, I revealed myself as Vanilla townie and it's for sure that I will appear as a contestant presuming I get killed. You're very well aware that once I reveal my alignment there's a zero percent chance that it'd come fake. Just for the sake of warning,that considering anybody can solve today's riddle, I want them not to waste their investigation on me but to investigate the other users such as Megagun and others. We need evidences or we r dead. Finally, I urge the other players to perform the desired activities i.e to present their views on the matter and decision to vote someone. It's essential ATM.