Jump to content

Paul25

Veterans
  • Posts

    2181
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Events

Reborn Development Blog

Rejuvenation Development Blog

Starlight Divide Devblog

Desolation Dev Blog

Everything posted by Paul25

  1. Your preconceived notion need not necessarily be true. Quoting's working for me now. Huh
  2. This is an excerpt from Nick's post which may be the answer for you: During the first night, the King picks a player to be a part of the court. Furthermore, the living players privately PM me with the name of someone they'd like to make a part of the court. The 2 players with the most votes are appointed to the court. If the King or the King's appointed player happens to be one of the Top, the next players with the most votes are appointed.
  3. Eh, lemme understand What's going on with the discussion about KC. So Jace claims that he tried to nominate Purple. Uhmmm, Does that mean he voted for a maf? Oh, I shouldn't wonder because ikr that Mafia won't be too smart to claim that publicly. Nvm Yikes, Quoting is broken like always. BTW Candy I understood by going through the current discussion that the court disbands at most when it has two members thereby nulling your statement that the king will remain with only one maf by killing his own members. Again, I could misunderstand that so nvm. Jace even claims that the king is killing their own members. Huh, does that mean Nick is a court member? OwO, Thanks Alistair considering how dumb I'm, I can relax now. =] What's the need to read only Alphagar's comment at first? T.T
  4. @Alphagar Evaluate the bright end, we did discard a mafia member, so you shouldn't feel too bad. It's alright If you suspect me. Idm
  5. Does that means the killer had used a weapon made of metal to kill her in the basement room? I remember Quinn mentioning that we're almost there on the very first day.
  6. Random wondering: Leads what doyou even mean, Alphagar?
  7. Wait, Is it required to post a specific bold reason or am I just straining and spoiling time. Reasons as to why I suspect Alphagar: Weird tone; wondering; upset to some extent at the death of two players.
  8. Afaiik, Bean is the one who uses that weird 'Noot Noot' phrase. So, probably Soso bean is the required murderer we have been looking for.
  9. Anon player screams upon visiting, some important conclusions: That notifies the existence of a loudmouth sort of role. It even implies that Bell is a visiting role, hence townlean or third party lean on him.
  10. Alphagar and her slight suspicious comment: I fail to understand as to why she commented like that. Probably, either she hastily read the Dive's post and overlooked what happened or she is a mafian ally who is mourning for purple's death. Just for the sake of clarity, I want to let you know that Towns even did kill a mafia. Also, you are restricted to post useless comments so please bear in mind. Dive's Statement: For this day, random votes will not be counted. All votes must be accompanied with a reason, written in bold.
  11. Speculations as to what could be the case for Purpleicada and Megagun's kill: As clearly evident from the data provided by Dive, Purpleicada was the victim of bomb link. Either ,The bomb had been compelled to explode in her hands by the controller or she revealed a gift from someone which consisted bomb in it. On the other way around, Megagun was a victim of the mafia kill. Rip , the Doctor, an another useful role is no more.
  12. That 1iEs could be an indicator of the glitch condition.
  13. BTW, Corso was probably trying to protect an ally of his. Although, this statement is evidenceless, I'm skeptical about him being an another scum.
  14. Pros of not exposing the mafia rule. Yay, Roswell the scum had been lynched, now let's press on to Newt. feelscool Vote: Newt Rip Newt, your useful role is useless after we lynch you. What a tragic fate....... And Lia, we did it at the very first phase afaik. But wait, how there had been a tie between those two roles. IG there had been glitch of some sort which compared the first day's disclosure with last day.
  15. Might as well place my vote on someone based on yesterday's data and Omgus the one who voted me 2day. Vote: NickCrash Apparently, your reason for voting me last day was pretty much strong and with concrete evidence, it seems. UwU
  16. Rip towns. What a tragic fate is this! feelsbad to see towns dying ;-; I can't figure out anyone worth lynching this phase yet or guilty aside from sosobean
  17. jw, why Roswell's saved. Is it just because he was townie and Amine's report's corrupt and a town role saved him from the clutches of death? I've yet suspicious implications about this case. It could also be probable that a scum had protected his fellow player from death unless there are no such roles. Well, as of now I'll believe the first probability. Besides, there are no night kills. That even makes me to think that either the scums didn't had their necessary achievement or the one who they targeted were protected by some other role. Ow, so not to use any sort of 4 syllable word. Fine, gonna bear in mind that information. Ty Alistair and Lia. Since I and probably all have certain misgivings about going for Ali,so might as well not misplace something. Hence, I'm gonna rely on Amine and cast my vote on Newt. Let's see whether it'll be true or not this time. Fortune has played false on us last day, but I'm sure that it'll play true on ourselves someday. Eliminate: Newt
  18. @Alphagar Those votes are none other than instinct based vote.
  19. Might as well analyze page 4 thoroughly. Chief event of page 4: Mass participation (or formation of) on hunch based bw. Inference: Bandwagoners joined Bean's bw especially without enough evidence and justification. It seems that there lies a mystery here. I hope I can count on the possible misgivings but since most of the players' resolution was to vote Bean, it'd make me think that those who partook in it are most likely potential scums. Looking for an opportune moment to poll their vote, they hastily decided to just vote Bean for the sake of voting a probable town aligned player such that they are excusable in case Bean is non town. Amidst many Bws were formed against other players so that the bw formers could very well stay on the neutral list. Slight suspicion to them too. Personally I have some doubts against lynching Bean randomly. However, I'm quite reluctant to place my vote on someone else thinking the possibility about what might happen just in case Bean is Town. Alright then, I have nothing more to discuss. I swear, I'm not gonna commit what I did in a certain game which eventually lead to an indefinite death of me a.k.a an innocent. T.T
  20. Alright, I noticed it now. Earlier I overlooked it. ''Town don't have the luxury of knowing who's with them, so they'd be going in blind, and probably won't be changing their roles'' Inference: I didn't exactly comprehend the last line as I'm too dumb to get the meaning. We won't be altering our roles? Huh you meant votes probably! So probably you should not have too changed your vote without enough evidence and info. :thinking:
×
×
  • Create New...