Jump to content

Bazaro

Veterans
  • Posts

    1279
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Events

Reborn Development Blog

Rejuvenation Development Blog

Desolation Dev Blog

Everything posted by Bazaro

  1. @DigitalAmber how funny you claim to be the Noble. Hilarious, even! If you're going to lie like this, at least make sure the role you impersonate won't retort. [Eliminate] DigitalAmber edit: [Unvote] Jace Stormkirk
  2. Again, quit letting Venus waste your time (sorry dude, I know you're just having fun) There's WAY too many people who haven't talked much at all, those are WAY more suspicious than anyone here imo. Call it bandwagonning, but he's been accused from the start and hasn't defended himself once. [Eliminate] Seal
  3. It was just luck in my favor is all. If Cops want to waste a kill on a harmless role like mine, go for it I guess.
  4. I ain't claiming nothing~ Yes, The Traitor role would appear as a Mafioso if you just checked their alignment, but I have more to my investigation than just that. I'll spare you the details until my untimely demise, whenever it may be. Edit: fixed typo
  5. There's 4 protecting roles of sorts: Doctor (protection) Bodyguard (sacrifices self to take a death for someone else) Governor (nullification) Bad Cop (protection + nullification)
  6. I lied, oops. I learned one thing from last night: Venus is not a Cop, so we shouldn't waste our time lynching them. I didn't want to put myself out there too quickly.
  7. I have nothing to report either. Amber could've only been killed by: The Vigilante The Traitor (it's a one shot, so very unlikely this early on) Whoever The Supplier armed Given the odds, I'd say it's safe to say it's the Vigilante's first kill.
  8. Similarly to Megagun, Jace was against cooperation among roles. They've also been fairly curt and minimal with their messages, as if they're avoiding interacting. Maybe it's just who they are, I'm not as familiar with everyone as most, but it seems suspicious nonetheless.
  9. Hi /late. Agreeing with Dive on this last bit. Ending your post requirement so early into the day is pretty suspicious. I'll wait before I point fingers at them yet so... [Eliminate Jace Stormkirk]
  10. Whoa, chill guys. I know Mega is sus and I'd vote him myself, but we haven't heard all of our news from last night. I still find DigitalAmber suspicious from the last day, so I'll stick to my vote then unless people decide to talk instead of rushing their vote and letting everyone suspicious get away with the crowd without talking either. [Eliminate DigitalAmber]
  11. It sounds like you're just dissuading cooperation. We don't have to work together vs the "evil roles" but it's in all of our best interests to do so. At least this way, we can get as many winners as possible with minimal conflict. I thought we cleared that up after N0? "Feasible" is synonymous with "possible," and it is certainly possible to do so. As long as all of the non-evil roles are willing to work together and not cause senseless conflict, what's the reason to not do so? As long as the various protector and watcher roles cooperate and play smart, they won't die.
  12. At this point, it'd probably be riskier to try and kill them if they announced themselves. With all of the protection and watcher roles still alive, anyone who makes a move on them condemns themselves to failure or lynch.
  13. No dopple makes things less complicated, but it wasn't someone we needed to kill first, damn. I'm voting the same as last time, but I'll wait for everyone to input first. Mine was just as eventful as the last.
  14. Hooli sure likes to point fingers! Venus also makes a good point, the Assassin would likely be one who didn't vote Newt to avoid suspicion. I'm still not convinced about Amber's defense, so I'll trust the RNG on this one.
  15. Since it's tied (6/6) I'd rather not leave this vote to the King, no offense. Picking randomly to break the tie. [Unvote Venus] [Eliminate DigitalAmber] Edit: forums lagged for me so this point is moot. Oops
  16. Well... alright. RIP Saint, RIP us. This is fine. Really though, there's a lot of people who haven't talked much at all. Makes them seem pretty suspicious to me. Edit: Also @DigitalAmber there's a lot of fingers pointed your way. Any reason we shouldn't kill you?
  17. @Dark Rogue either of those options is fine by me. It shouldn't matter how many people win as long as I don't lose.
  18. Or you could be falsely roleclaiming to hide who you truly are, this is a game of deception after all. I was just looking for a reaction anyways Since they asked so nicely, I'll change my vote to someone who wants it. Be that way, Newt. [Unvote] DarkRogue [Eliminate] Venus
  19. Yay, my first accusation! I kinda hoped it would be over something more exciting than a poke. I was working all morning so this is just my first chance to do anything. Man, you guys are way too into bandwagonning. It's like you guys just want to hurry up and kill someone. If the Adventurer and Seer keep visiting each other each night, nothing will really get done, so after the next night they have no reason to visit each other anymore. They win, but they get nothing for winning and the game continues. Or they keep visiting each other and just keep letting people get lynched, essentially turning this whole game into Roulette. But at this point, there's really no reason to go on a witch hunt for them. Unless you want them dead, of course. Then we'd have to kill you! I'm voting here not because of the bandwagon, but because they're the only person who seemed opposed to the Adventurer and Seer meeting. Even if he role claimed. [Eliminate] Dark Rogue
  20. Guess I'll make the first change request
  21. 1) You are correct, sorry this wasn't clarified. These will be available this weekend (12/15) but don't expect them to be used too much. 2) Everything banned at the start of S3 was either because 1) they were too strong in one of the leaders' hands, and/or 2) they were too strong in the hands of a challenger (((Mega)) Diancie, Zapdos). 3) We have something in the works, but are still fine polishing it, and it'll hopefully get a better initial response than... this. Stay tuned. 4) Different types have different play styles, and the leaders themselves often just didn't like how a certain mon works with their playstyles. I'll try to recall what I can about the things that only one type has: 5) The leaders looked for the kinds of trainer cards they would use X legendary against and build accordingly in any format, and we tried them in places where leader supposedly had advantage. These ones are the ones that weren't too bad in testing + the leaders were somewhat comfortable using.
×
×
  • Create New...