Jump to content

NickCrash

Veterans
  • Posts

    4080
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Events

Reborn Development Blog

Rejuvenation Development Blog

Desolation Dev Blog

Everything posted by NickCrash

  1. I certainly did not add the "pix~" parts Someone is mescyng with me Edit: Nvm it's April fools Got me I'm blaming @andracass for this
  2. @Bok Choi I am equally surprised. pix~ Although, to be fair, after Lykos's lynch, I feel a lot safer. pix~ I'm going to ask from the less active players to voice their opinions @cicada @Seal @Quillish And of course, in case she didn't check the thread yet, to provide a defense for herself @Walpurgis
  3. No. It means that Lia tried to visit you, and instead visited the merchant. Most probably Kiet wanted to save their own ass, switching with someone they expected not to get hit, or go the extra mile and try to make the wolves kill each other. Either you or Lia killed Kiet.
  4. If all unknowns are vampires, then there'd have to be 2 more wolves, to fit the maximum of 7/21 evil roles in the game. Besides, having 4 or 5 wolves would be overkill. They are informed and can co-ordinate their kills. The opening post might also take vampire kills into consideration, since they ensure town-numbers drop each day, as opposed with wolf kills. Bok looks like a paranoid townie to me, who revealed to save himself. His action would make sense in the scenario that both Jelly and Lykos were wolves, as it would stop Jace from finding out Jelly's alignment post mortem. Now that Jace reveals Jelly was town, we have 2 scenarios: i) Jace is lying. So anything goes since the alignments you've noted there take Jace's findings into face value. ii) Jace is honest. So Bok can be a wolf. Given that the opening post warns us how the wolves are an imminent threat, we ought to fish them out fast. It looks like we finally have a lead. [Eliminate] Walpurgis
  5. Why are you bussing him like that? Can we make sure Amber stays at home tonight? kthnxbye
  6. To be fair, the accusation is that you are one of those monsters. You assert that you are town, pretty much as everyone else playing this game. Had Jelly not said anything, I wouldn't have been suspicious of you. However, I have to agree with you one one thing: More people need to talk and let us know what they think, or what they've found out via their NAs.
  7. Initially I thought Bok was mafia, but his posts this and the previous day phase have changed my mind. To be honest, I was not expecting the "good boi" to actually cancel this night, but we can be certain that no vampire would do it. I am still suspicious as to how Jelly knew Lykos was the Acolyte. To me, that looks like an incredible blunder by the wolves. Given there is no "Neighbour" role that allows private chats during the night, and also that Lykos never said anything indicative of his role, that Jelly slipped. For that reason, and to know what Lykos thinks about the issue, I asked for the double lynch. The only other person Jelly claimed to know the role of, is @Jason Grace. I'd like you to roleclaim. At the same time, with the worst case scenario of having lynched 1/7 evils, I would like to add some pressure on people who have not yet provided any info or scumreading. @Quillish what is your NA and whom are you going to visit tonight? @Walpurgis you claimed that Jelly convinced you of something. He read Amber and I as wolves. Do you agree with that statement? How can you be of assistance? @cicada does your vote hold any significance?
  8. Now would be a good time for the "Boy who cries wolf" to allow us a double lynch. Otherwise let's hope the Healer does a good job.
  9. I don't get your vote on Drago. Care to explain?
  10. Btw we need more people to contribute. I know life can be busy and time can be limited, but it's really hard to read people when they've written nothing (or close to it) all game. @sailboat I suppose you give the warnings in person. Is it possible you hesitate to autokill because evil roles are among the inactives?
  11. A scum priest would be really problematic. [Eliminate] Jelly
  12. @Dragoknight To quess Alaris's role is not that hard. I had come to the same conclusion as well. He had used Bok's response as a great excuse to hide his Paladin powers, because a tie would lead to NO LYNCH. Jelly called him out, and I found that suspicious. Jelly also called Lykos the Acolyte, which is also suspicious. At least I don't know how one comes to that conclusion. It's like he knew beforehand. He (correctly) called Yahen a Vampire, early on. That could be because: i) He's that damn good at reading people ii) He's town/wolf and had checked her with his Priest-powers iii) He's a vampire who bussed Yahen, trying to gain town-cred. In fact, the last one is in the realm of probabilities. NAs from a vampire to another provide them with a common chat. If Yahen randomly blocked Jelly, she'd gain a chat with him. pending verification because I've realized I've been calling @Yahen a "she" all game. gimme a thumbs-up if I should continue. react with "sad if not. People Alive
  13. Having multiples of every role can be problematic. I was thinking with single roles in mind. Now it's harder to evaluate things accurately. Thank you @CrimsonDragon21 for reminding me of the possibilities. Still, I was the only one to claim Swapped on D2. Had there been more than 1 merchant, their targets ought to have revealed. I also believe @Bok Choi was the only one to have claimed Witched D1? D2? D3 we got 2 claims of being witched (which is reasonable) and 2 claims of swaps. It gets progressively more confusing. Btw Bok, your message is exactly like mine, so I can trust your claim. I'd like both of you to give me your views on the following train of thought, possibly what I've missed, and what that might mean. If both the Merchant and the Witch are included in an action, I think it goes like this. The Merchant (M) must have priority. He chooses to swap himself with person A The Witch forces A and B to target each other. (A<-NA->B) By Merchant powers, all NAs on A go to M and vice versa. So we get B to visit M and do their NA, AND M to visit B and do nothing. (M<-NA->B) If someone were to target M that night, they'd go towards A. If the Witch forces the Merchant to visit someone, then I suppose this follows: M (having priority) swaps himself with person A (M<-S->A) Then the Witch tries to force M on someone (B), instead gets A (A<-NA->B) If there are multiple Witches, then I suppose a lot of outcomes are possible. Yet, people don't announce during the Day-phases if they'd been witched or not. Please Do.
  14. @Jelly Have you perhaps checked Jace's alignment? Is it possible to know whether his claims on Nano's and Yahen's alignment are correct?
  15. The Merchant swaps with himself. The Witch controls two people to each other. Were you swapped or controlled? If you were swapped, I see 2 possibilities here: 1) One of you is the Merchant and chose the other 2) One of you is lying about being Swapped. Bok claims not to know what it means, so they claim not to be the Merchant. Jelly has already claimed Priest, so it doesn't follow to claim Merchant as well. So I believe one of you is lying. Please provide the exact message you received.
  16. @Jelly For those who wouldn't have caught on that, Bok's post provided a good excuse. That was needless.
  17. On that note, and because we need to lynch someone today, I might as well contribute to that. Bok has accused me, and read my defense. I answered his points, and others have explained things as well. Yet he says he sticks to his vote. That, right now, is without argumentation, based on a hunch. That's similar to what Crimson does above. Crimson's take appears genuine. Bok looks like they already have an idea and try to make the facts support it. Bok gave a self-contradictory statement, based on what occured with Bazaro on Day 1. He tunnels and disregards the evidence. That's why I believe he's a scum trying to initiate a bw on me, who then saw their arguments were not so strong, so they only kept their vote, just in case. Let me return that favor. [Eliminate] Bok @Hypurr @sailboat Would it be possible to get a heads-up on how many people have yet to meet the post requirements every, say, 24h ? Notes: - The Paladin's vote counts as 2 - The Contrarian's vote counts as -1, unless they passed it for the night. Let's bear those 2 in mind, when we take a look at the vote tally. Current Votes ~VOTES~ Alistair (1): Quillish Nick (1): Bok Newt (1): (Alistair1), (Yahen1), Crimson Seal (1): Drago Yahen (3): Lykos, jelly, Cicada Bok (2): Alaris, Nick
  18. I seriously doubt the latter. It's specific. It's "Vampire A". If boat were to hide which vampire would attack, he would say something like "The Vampires are to attack" or... nothing, since they can inform the vampire in question. IMO the same vamp aka you got to attack twice in a row based on rng Not necessarily. We need to have at least 9 votes, not all targeted at the same person. I'd like to remind people that while Seal took his vote back when he was informed that it might do more harm than good, @Jason Grace did not. Let's hear what he has to say. @Alistair already asked for his views on the matter, and I also want to read them.
  19. It's not surprising. By my count, there are 12 roles that have a NA, still alive. And a softclaim to back that up. In fact, I'm the coolest bunny in the shed. Y'all just jelly, jelly included.
  20. @Alistair Are we not 21? In total they ought to be 7 VVV/WWWW or VVVV/WWW Edit: The above looks horrific 3V - 4W or 4V - 3W Much better
  21. Let me address that. 1. Not all votes have the same value. At the same time, not all votes are final. 2. Not all votes are meant to kill someone. The bandwagons formed, as well as the justification one provides for the vote are important. In my opinion, all who vote should have proper reasoning behind their votes. I explained how a direct vote carries consequences, and thus I'm willing to accept your suspicion. I also explained how random votes, as opposed to abstains, increase the probability for a lynch. 3. By keeping my vote on Bazaro, I am certainly NOT steering the lynch off of him. I was not convinced by his defense, thought of him as a wolf trying to appear towny, and had no better target to lynch. Now that I know he's Town, of course I have to review my thoughts and all that has been said so far (at least by those who contributed). 4. I did NOT throw suspicion onto "anybody who voted for anyone else". You are misrepresenting me there. Essentially what you claim is either a) that I didn't really want a lynch, but wanted to push for Bazaro's in particular, which is in direct contrast to your accusation in Point3 (see right above), or b) that increasing the votes without proper justification (and indirectly pushing for the lynch) is something not worth mentioning, and I'm the bad guy who pointed it out. 5. It would be disingenuous of me to remove my vote, when a no-lynch was guaranteed.
×
×
  • Create New...