Jump to content

andracass

Veterans
  • Posts

    1827
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    132

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Events

Reborn Development Blog

Rejuvenation Development Blog

Starlight Divide Devblog

Desolation Dev Blog

Posts posted by andracass

  1. 2 hours ago, ShogokiX said:

    By the way...there is this one question that has been bugging me for some time now...

    With the 18.2 update you guys changed the AI to be smarter. Does this also include the AI of your partners, like for example Shelly during the orphanage escape, or Cain during the old Yureju Building raid?

    yup. same ai.

  2. don't flail too hard now.

    and didn't nick already say? it's not like we don't have time.

    but also...

    Just now, Falirion said:

    but i garantie you that after both me and nick are dead this game will still be going and you all will be scratching your heads as too why,

    on what grounds do you make this guarantee? 

  3. 19 minutes ago, Falirion said:

    So lynching a confirmed killing 3rd party wastes time? what?! it only does so, IF people are not voting her, as that seems to be the only way she dies... by having everyone vote her

     

    16 minutes ago, NickCrash said:

    Btw, why do you belive killing Lia wastes time? If she can only be killed by a unanimous vote, it's worth trying it. Time is all we have.

    let's ignore the suspiciously close timing for a moment. 

    we have a nice list of people and alignments. could it be altered by outside interference, whether it be disguises, actressing, or whatever? sure! but i think disputing the validity of such a list would be the first tactic of a mafia that's really getting backed into a corner.

    now, as this list is also posted in the forum, lia can also read this list! we don't really know if she can win with town or not, but right now we are just blindly assuming that it is a "not". for all we know, she could've already won, and the rest doesn't particularly matter. again, we don't know! what's more important is that she's a killing role that isn't mafia aligned, which then means she can target mafia members. additional killing roles would make it easier to chip through that list of unconfirmed peeps.

    but let's get back to that suspicious timing. 

    because, it turns out, both nick and fali are unconfirmed! who's shocked.

    the reasons i have for not voting lia are already enough for there to only be a limited number of circumstance in which i would vote her (which i'm mostly just saying as a technicality.)

    but why even vote lia when nick suggested killing a confirmed townie?

  4. 2 minutes ago, NickCrash said:

    I believe we've had a discussion about a mafia role appearing town in my checks and the revivals. Nobody is off the hook.

    ooh, good cover.

    unfortunately, that doesn't quite apply to me. as drago stated, the confirmation for me comes from the day 2 challenge, which, if i'm understanding it correctly, would make my towniness independent of both of those things.

  5. 2 hours ago, NickCrash said:

    I can't believe I'm getting lynched. 

     

    If we can somehow convince Aldo, Sophie and Yin to vote, Aldo could shoot Cass and spare me the trouble.

     

    Otherwise, we can lynch them first, and have Astra kill one of them during the night, in order to create the exact same scenario next Day_Phase, without them.

    hi kids so let's have a quick chat about this.

    first, killing lia wastes time. no vote there from me.

    second, this kid over here is trying to get y'all to kill a confirmed townie so he doesn't get lynched.

    yikes.

  6. 39 minutes ago, Falirion said:

    With the following being the description of the coyote's ability i am pretty sure that he is indeed town:
    Coyote:

    Taken from the role reveal on day 4 in the bread boat, the doubtful point would more likely be if yin really is the coyote

    ah, interesting, a modified coyote.

  7. okay so i have a very important question

    the rules specifically state the count can be reset by "Admins, or moderators for a number ending in 7"

    now, you see, there is a comma in that statement, which means that the segment before and the segment after the comma should be considered to be independent of each other

    to which i see the rules as being, effectively, a two-part system:

    moderators can reset the count for a number ending in 7

    admins can just reset whenever

     

    so, in conclusion:

    0

×
×
  • Create New...