Jump to content

Anti_Hero

Veterans
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    589

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Forums

Events

Reborn Development Blog

Rejuvenation Development Blog

Desolation Dev Blog

Everything posted by Anti_Hero

  1. Anti_Hero
    Sincerely i find it really strange. I can't say for sure. But look at Paul's case, he tried to defend himself and if he had more time he might have done it. And if we think about his roleclaim. If he was indeed the hunter and a villager the judge might have found him dangerous and killed him because of that. On the other hand if the judge was a villager and thought Paul was a witch then then he might kill him too. Back to cool girl. She didn't even try to defend...
  2. Anti_Hero
    But what do you think about the situation? As i said before i find it suspicious. Also cool girl last response doesn't help. She only stated she is inocent without trying to persuade us much. Like she already gave up... I find this strange
  3. Anti_Hero

    New SaveGame

    Anti_Hero replied to Rosik's topic in Reborn City

    Yes. If you give him that item it will be unavailable for you
  4. Anti_Hero

    New SaveGame

    Anti_Hero replied to Rosik's topic in Reborn City

    You may be referring on giving the (amethyst pendant? Or was it ruby ring) away or not. This is to get a special item (i won't reveal more unless you ask for spoilers) if you get the "wrong answer" them that item is only accessible later in game (not in this episode)
  5. Anti_Hero

    chespin egg

    Anti_Hero replied to kyle3927's question in On the Hunt

    I think it's around 6am
  6. Anti_Hero
    Lets make another post, one step closer to post requirement... but this thread stagnated a bit... no defence or ofence
  7. Anti_Hero
    Hello people. First. Cool girl was indeed suspicious and as i said last day i found it suspicious why no one was voting like the day before on the inactive. The judge killing Paul showed me 2 options. Or was someone trying to show us they are town or an inexperienced player who just want to use their ability We have to remember that the gravedigger can be a witch and any person who died has his role revealed to him. He can so (and his companions, if there are any) roleclaim any of those roles Because of this is won't roleclaim and i find cool girl also suspicious. As stated by others. It only makes us targets by both assassin and coven Eliminate] Cool Girl
  8. Anti_Hero
    Just a little something. You can also see how people responded rather than the content
  9. Anti_Hero
    Since the example said explain your view I would go from broad to specific and end in the conclusion, to organize ideas. I dont think its an obligation, just that it seems better to me.
  10. Anti_Hero
    I think both are correct. But in case fo the first one, since the conclusion comes first some people may not listen to the rest. In your exams it doesnt really matter but its normally prefered the first one, since most teachers/professors only look at the solution/conclusion and then to the reason. Some questions are also formed like this: Is blood donation for money ethically correct? Why? In case of this example you said, its a simple yes or no question, not asking for a reason, you only give it to justify your point of view but wasnt required in the question, so the conclusion would be enough and i see no reason to make an exact order. if the question would be, "Explain your view on people getting paid to donate blood and if it is ethically correct." in this case I would prefer putting the conclusion last.
  11. Anti_Hero
    Not sure, since I was never in italy and the restaurants adapt their recipes in each country, so an italian restaurant doesnt mean real italian food (and ingredients may be different) Do you think you are the center of the life of someone else?
  12. Anti_Hero
    Yup. Although i only was on the ice once. At some point in your life, did you think you are the most clumsy person ever?
  13. Anti_Hero
    @Paul25 i believe the phase won't be extended. Then, who would you kill? Let's see your reasoning that might change my vote
  14. Anti_Hero
    @Paul25 I'm sorry. But if swear that it was the first result in got And would people that vote no one please say why? Do you trust the judge?
  15. Anti_Hero
    By this randomised choice I apologize to Paul. [Eliminate] Paul 25
  16. Anti_Hero
    @Venus the nurse may be a witch too... @Lord Drakyle this is my opinion, that i formed observing the last few games, normaly mafias dont risk to be eliminated by the game master, and even if they were one of them, if they get modkilled doesnt really make a diference, in that case you are giving turns to the witches, mimiking the no lynch situation but worse (if there wouldnt be a judge i would go for no lynch to gain time) in this case with the judges alignment dubious we cant risk a no lynch aproach, and killing someone inactive will most likely result in more angels... killing someone else in my opinion would most likely get us to a witch. Also we have to think that there are multiple witches that dont want to kill one fo their own, so they will try to make people vote on someone else. If there would be a random vote of someone inocent then the probability of geting a witch would be high, on another habd if the random vote would be from a witch it would be manipulated.
  17. Anti_Hero
    the one who started it was jace if im not mistaken. Here you have a concrete suspect. But again, we cant be sure of anyone, i cant be sure of you or of anyone else. That is why i sugested it to be randome but then of course if I or someone else did that then that person would be suspected to manipulate the results and thus be a witch
  18. Anti_Hero
    Then I have suspicion on anyone who lynches the inactive
  19. Anti_Hero
    @Lord Drakyle even so... The most likely outcome is to be inocent . That only helps the witches
  20. Anti_Hero
    I personally believe greninja is inocent. But there might be a possibility that he said that player X is inocent so that people would trust him, or both were witches... We don't know if the judge is a witch. It is highly probable, we need to kill someone to make sure he doesn't have the chance too. And I would like that the person lynched has an opportunity to defend themselves And curiously no one suggested to lynch the ones with no posts ... Last time by this time we already had some votes
  21. Anti_Hero
    I think everyone wants to protect themselves. It's dangerous to talk a lot
  22. Anti_Hero
    @Sceptilespy your files gave me an idea, frozen lake (lame name I know) Basically a fighting move can break the ice freezing the Pokémon (except ice and flying types) as would earthquake... The rest would be like your filed (just can't understand thunder wave)
  23. Anti_Hero
    There are some key pokemon that makes your life easier Bellow are some usefull or key pokemon / strategies to make the fight easier and so faster... some i just beat, others i needed some strategy or saw some that worked really well here on the forum. I would suggest you to add one rule, no Online function or sandbox mode
  24. Anti_Hero
    Cant you give abra a weak TM? that way he is passable till level 16 and then he is better
  25. Anti_Hero
    I believe some of your pokemon can be op Like vulpix (drought is a strong ability) But there are others I would consider weak in comparison. Like drowse I believe there will be more people to pick some specific Pokémon that others. (Maybe I just never really used drowse but I don't consider him to be a useful one im sorry
×
×
  • Create New...