Lord Drakyle

oh.... well...someone gimme a gun ill shoot nano so he can't get one and then wont be able to have history repeat itself.

sounds like whoever your character is, you got all 3 roles from the same alignment?

also yeah unless we find reason to trust em, but still not as bad as nano was.

i mean there is the Sheriff and even then wouldnt them having a 3rd party role as a secondary or tertiary make them not hostile but have to be hostile if they wanted extra points? also overlooked the Bean because the chances of it going pinpoint precise that the death target would be the stump, the gun gift Kiet and the nothing some random is insanely low.

people usually mention when they get a gun, DONT GIVE NANO ONE, let history remind us why that is not a good idea, i think they likely started the game with it.

Time will tell i suppose if you are trusting the wrong folks or not You can kick toy gunsmith off the list as their guns dont kill only silenced. Not sure the illusionist is the one that did it it would be too conveniently timed if ya ask me. which leaves the rest.

Also how can anyone say those in their group apart from Yahy this early are definitely inno?

hard to say if Nano or Nicki is the right choice (im struggling to count the votes), if we can agree Nano seems a better option and there is visible signs people agree then ill revert to Nano whom i still dont trust but before that i wanna hear what Kiet has to say in their defence.

what if they put pineapple on it? reveal the heretics.

gonna have to wait to hear them explain i have theories one being that because Lia was in a showmance with Yahen while not in the core group Yahen was in they MAY have thought she was manipulating both sides, unlikely but maybe, though the more simple and easier thought if they are innocent is that they wanted a fighting chance again because the massive bandwagon on them, doesn't make it any less suspicious just more understandable.

Holy jesus, Kiet, can ya tell us anything about what made ya decide to shoot Lia? Assuming just desperation as no one wants to get lynched but still might be anything else. @CrimsonDragon21

i don't trust Nano as far as i can throw him but this bandwagoning on Kiet for reasons being kept secret by the looks of it, im willing to stick my neck out at the risk of suspicion to give Kiet a chance to prove we can trust em sorry Nicki though Nicki was somewhat quiet i think? didnt see much of her. [Unvote] Nano [Evict] Nicki Again sorry Nicki, i would rather stick with Nano but trying to save someone from a suspicious band wagon seems more favorable and besides forces those groups bandwagoning Kiet to stop keeping secrets and tell us why they all seem to agree on voting Kiet in particular.

The only suspicious folks seem to be the groups really, i would wager mafia are in all of them to take advantage to sway votes in their favor in mass, and if ya wanna give Kiet a chance, more likely to survive if Nano is voted as last i counted Nano had more votes than Nicki. But not yet more than Kiet

just noticed this but: @Black Swordsman you basically admit you are bandwagoning for the sake of bandwagoning? suspicious af

Now this is why i don't join alliances or groups, my vote is MINE, end of story and no group will decide my vote for me, a bad choice or good choice it remains my choice. Now i have seen people saying back and forth Kiet is inno or nano is inno or Newt is inno or something, but not been able to catch the proof of this and just sounds like someone protecting their own group members, so i cannot fully trust a damn word from anyone right now, so i have to go off my gut and what i think from what i see, what i have seen is Newt is willing to be roleblocked to argue his innocence, on my scale i get 70% town vibe, 30% desperate scum from Newt. not sure about Kiet, Nano however? I can't read anything and all i see is a sudden shift in people defending them and Newt without reasons i can fathom being individual decisions and just biased favor or biased opposition, i'm feeling like lynching Newt would not be the right vote, but evicting Nano? ehhh Not so convinced of his innocence, so let's see how it goes then: [Unvote] Newt [Evict] Nano4 @CrimsonDragon21 , @Nano4 , @Newt Would you 3 people try help me understand what the evidence is supporting your innocence, not so much needed from you Toot Toots it's more or less Nano and Kiet, i just dont like seeing all these groups powering together to defend their own in opposition to making a vote based on individual, unbiased thoughts.

translation: 'Correct, you are a good nano4' ?

ECT brutalised anyone who attempt a harmful role on him preventign it working which makes him kinda bulletproof no?

i mean, he could if he was the ECT but then he would be admitting to also being possibly a Coyote

i pinged em for ya

@IkeSmasher_xX @Black Swordsman neeerds

My Liaaaaa, you should call the group: Lia and her not so important companions.

I can't stand Lisa Simpson, always ruining fun. Also it amuses me everyone forming showmances and groups and i'm here being a loner. That said How long do we have left of the Day Phase? and do we know anyone who hasn't met their post/vote requirements yet? That Daily Task reward looks juicy.

He does trust you, but you already are in a showmance so he cant invite you to one in order to take advantage of that trust

no one got evicted by the production team by means we have yet to figure out is one thing worth noting.

i think it's well established by now the Lykos role provided the pizza