-Unknown-
-
Posts
33 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Reborn Development Blog
Rejuvenation Development Blog
Starlight Divide Devblog
Desolation Dev Blog
Posts posted by -Unknown-
-
-
For ONLY A SELECT FEW, it has made them so much better. I'd look you in the eye and call you a damn liar if you said you were totally gonna use Pinsir, or Mawile, or Kangaskhan (unless you play NU) in the metagame, for serious. Megas have made garbage Pokemon way better, and really good Pokemon generally astronomically fan-serviced.
I really would ask the ones that have gone against me.
-
nonono, Neo. Please don't take my non-comment as ignorance here - because I'm very interested in that study. As you said, the only hang-up is that we're all waiting to figure out if the laws of physics were created with the universe, or have always been in place. As such - I don't know how to attack it properly and would rather refrain. I will say that I acknowledge that as an emerging development.
I'll share my opinion on the "laws" later after some college related things and personal things.
-
@Erick, I'm actually very glad I got to see this side of you.
Just a side note. In my opinion, the universe is the way it is because it always has been. The universe evolved the way it did because things were the way they are. If the universal constant of the force of Gravity were greater or lesser, we wouldn't be here. Some other race who is very different from us in some far away place would likely be having a similar debate about why things the way they are and if some divine being crafted Gravity to be twice what we know to specifically fit to them. The evolution of life and the entirety of the universe. Cosmological entities that don't fit the requirements of physics (within our understanding or not) would likely fail and die out while those that do would continue to thrive and swallow up others. The same goes for the existence and the ability to continue existing of life.
I like that and am quite fond of that ideal that you have and am quite associated with that as well in was you wouldn't imagine. Possibly.
-
Hilda have I ever told you how much I like you the intricate details of the designs and organization of the materials that you bring to the discussion of this topic are some of the most polished skills of reading writing and composition that I have seen from another person. As far as topic goes to and from the "topic" I'll do my best to explain in it a term that I'm sure most of you would find logical.
Hilda Please list all links to all of "un-original Ideas" (Historical events, Religious ideologies and/or documents/factions, Philosophy and/or Socialogy and/or Physical and/or Metaphysical "concepts, laws, and/or Proofs etc." that came from people places things/ideas etc. (I'm sure you get the point)) along with everyone else optionally accordingly and/or repectively and I will do the same as such, so that EVERYONE that visits this and wishes to do so can do the research that is required and
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Personal notes:
Link bible's alterations and in non-consistencies.
Link fallacies and non fallacies of God
Optional Notes:
Link the intersection to which "Logic and Reason" can be in the same world as "Religion" and still be under same rules for sake of understand and Comprehension
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Legend:
{C}=Catholic
{CD}=Catholic Descent and/or Descendant (this Includes Christianity wether you or I like it or not)
{AGs}= Any of God and/or Gods however you want to put it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
God can and cannot be a being of what you can and cannot say is apart or among "human understanding" in other words what you call can be somethiing like a rule, law, energy, potential, inmate, potential, bloodline, culture, heritage, Right-of-Birth, Right-of-Passage, truth, ideal, and even sentience and non-sentience to and among the people places things and Ideas among and amongst those and/or those things that are in some way shape or form acting to among the Idea of what we in the current conscious and unconscious understanding are calling God.
However in my personal opinion (for those that might; Don't take it the wrong way. Instead I ask that you try to use and or manipulate however works best for you to try to understand the following by trying to find/see and all of the definitions/meanings of everything said/shown.) "God/god" may have been viewed by "us" s an intent in human image and not one multiple images meaning that god is seen as one way and not even multiple ways, for as I have said before, and will possibly ascribe to in the following post god can be any and/or all of those things in the first paragraph.
So the question to ask in my opinion would be how do you see god to you because apparent god is dependent upon the individual to even have, receive, gain, maintain, have some of self, will of action or
Have: Usually if the person has no Ideal or concept of "God/god" then the person usually cant be acted upon by such being nor be accounted to/by/and/or under those laws if that is what the person chooses to be the foundation and/or cornerstone of the possible fundamental of that individuals interpretation/understanding/relativityr/and any other definition and/or symbol with some some alignment to a definition giving at least some form of position to where that individual at least in and of it self is in relation it own [interpretation/relation/thoughts/Ideas (and/or) Ideals/"beliefs"/"Philosophy"/Ideology(meant to be a more definitive definition than Ideas and Ideals)of god that he or she has formed or has even decide to form however there is also possible interference or distortion and/or anythin
Recieve: To my knowledge of metaphysics "God{AGs} exist for MAN (meaning all of what you call and refer to as the "human race") meaning that it is the complete opposite of scale of light and Dark and before I appear to contradict myself (you see what I mean later on) The thing that they are one separated into as two and the whole purpose is to anywise and gain existence of the other to become whole and one again) so in other words MAN is God and God is Man Meaning that it is a two way relationship
Perfection: perfection is usually seen upon the indivual but due to main herd mentality that many including those at least somewhat affiliated site have of "Humans or imperfect" and ("Humans are Weak beings"( I will get to this another time)). You forget to understand that everything else that is seen by and Imperfect being is also imperfect in and of itself because imperfection cannot be perfection as Light cannot be Dark. (There is a possibility that you can even say that imperfect cannot even see perfect as Light cannot even see Dark. The Logic and or Reasoning behind this (that I'm sure most of you would find someway reasonable) is what most of you would/could//may have a possibility of a tendency to say "...Darkness is the absence of light." In other words meaning that it is not there, in other worlds can be transmuted/translated to meaning that perfect and imperfect are not in/on the same dimension and/or (I'm sure some of you would might align with "and" though") In the same level of existence/expression and/or on the same level of existence/expression.) Also to say you cannot see what you are not because you not beingg it or ever having it or ever experience/experiencing it cannot even perceive to be what it is and as such you will not perceive to be what you have no essence of but instead will perceive to be any of the following corresponding knowledge, experiences, or essences of your being that you associate and or for terrible lack of better words at the moment "align" with that thing respectivy to make see and/or conceptualize a form for that of which you are perceiving to be in an among that existence to and for a level for you then begin to work your way to sing and perceiving what it is as a whole. That would then have to go into what could be called for a lack of better "materials" dimensions. Side Note: I don't remember any perfection that isfor a lack better words self-sufficient needing creation and.or to create, that in itself is a waste and there fore would make that so called perfection an imperfection begin with. Meaning that any "God(s)/god(s)"{CD} that areas called perfect like that and those among the Catholic line and decent and those/similar are imperfect. Only the imperfect need to create and or creation wether it is an inside creation out. So by "God/god"{AGs}
Dimension: A planes of existence for things of such essences may it be (what Im sure most of you are more associated with) material, etherial, or more other existences and un-existences to act, be, and even "transmutate or Transmute" according to the specific laws and/or limitations of the dimension(s) that the are expressing themselves on. A Dimension are more so the way you use, bend, manipulate, and or choose to act/ exist upon a certain level plane of exitence(s) and "Dimensions" can be more seen as to how you all together interact with the "Rules" of the dimension of requirement to even be there on that specific level plane of existence(s). The only really stepping you from going to the other dimensions is your thoughts and what is said above as well as some other factors that may or may not even be relevant depending on how you look at this and interpret this again as another unique individual. So If you want this tie into the subject "God?" I would have to say the for god to even be able to be conceptualized in the first place he might actually have to use a dimension and be in context within the laws of dimension or thought dimension that which in and of itself if were to be again by an "imperfect" being would make "God" itself in and of itself Imperfect for even being able to be expressed in a dimension wether it is below with or above the planes physical dimensional existence because as I said above earlier the "(There is a possibility that you can even say that imperfect cannot even see perfect as Light cannot even see Dark. The Logic and or Reasoning behind this (that I'm sure most of you would find someway reasonable) is what most of you would/could//may have a possibility of a tendency to say "...Darkness is the absence of light." In other words meaning that it is not there, in other worlds can be transmuted/translated to meaning that perfect and imperfect are not in/on the same dimension and/or (I'm sure some of you would might align with "and" though") In the same level of existence/expression and/or on the same level of existence/expression.)" Not the mention that if the dimension are all one, being that they are all still "fundamentally" a way of existing and/or expressing one self in/and of itself to and amongst itself this, then "God/god" existing on any one one of those dimension in and of itself would be by it own definition be imperfect by its ((")own(")) defining "law(s)" Meaning that there
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So the logic of this faith Hilda that you speak of is to actually believe in a being of at least some type to basically be what you hope for it them to be. Examples from the churches I have been to not for the religion or "god" if you will are "God WE HOPE that you guide us and watch over us..., ...and Lord WE PRAY that you would STILL CONTINUE to watch over us and guide and..., (other Examples) Shango PLEASE WATCH over our battle..., OSHUN please don't blow our house down, Jahova HAS NEVER done any wrong to us..., PRAY that [Name of a "god" preferably of a religion] [whatever]. When I prefer to use a religion it is not that it's because I have problem with it (at least not enough to prevent me from being "unbiased") but its that its pretty that all of the (for lack of bette words no insults are attempted/intended to be made) all of the so-called bullshit usually, consistently, quite very often comes from religion and there is aparentl only the major ones still including ones "smaller" than them accordingly and respectively that you hear/recieve/deal with the most bullshit (i'm sorry but I really don't a better way to put this).
For now I'll post this so that I' look like a Etiolate-Chasey versus a Gengar in chat. and I'll continue to type more to complete the however the things you see in this post will remain the same but will be separated by a double dashed line like the one I'm sure you have seen above (somewhere).
Note: the only edit was changing the text to white so you could see it I apologize for the mistake of making it unreadable to you.
-
@ Laggless - I would post that since we're discussing the topic of God - that it's allowable until Amentura (-Unknown-) says otherwise. Alternatively, you can send me a private message with your response.
Again as long as it doesn't loop the conversation I don't mind nor do I really care this a Place to converse about a "Topic" as long as it goes some where I don't mind.
-
Ok Hilda before I say anything else I will take my time to read everything you typed so far since you literally have said the most and I'll see were it goes from there.
-
what are you on about
I literally shared with you a very small part of myself the only way i could try to.
I only hope I dont regret it.
-
(Currently Being Editted)
For now.
I don't Know.
-
Well, my new fantasy involves -Unknown- making a topic and actually fleshing out the OP. You know, giving particular reasons for the interest and desire talk about desired topics. I mean, instead, it just seems like he/she/xe is just making topics to farm. You want to hear things but you don't contribute your own thoughts as a starting point or as something you want to share. 'Give and you shall receive.'
Other than that, I might have some vague ideas of what I want in a fantasy home. You know, built in bar, game/video projection room, indoor pool with legit slide (not one of those slow, lame ones), and some other stuff.
I don't have a dream girl cuz one has to work within the framework of reality for relationship that has more meaning than a thought experiment.
I don't how but ill try so I guess Ill make a new topic and attempt to.
-
Laggless01
.1. Allow me to serve the situation of damnation to you in a way that is not viewed by non-believers. Yes,if you continue to denounce God based on evidences you deem are contradictory or insufficient, you are indeed choosing to spend eternity apart from Him. Notice the way I structured this scenario as a choice the damned make rather than the judgement God will make. I word it this way because I believe that everyone is a part of the "elect" and that on God's end, His choice was to pursue an eternity with you to the point where he came down as a lowly man and died an excruciating death to keep that possibility alive for you. By believing in Christ, you are essentially putting CHRIST on the stand under your name in the courtroom instead of yourself. Christ lived a completely sinless life - therefore the judgement for you - as he is your token - is that Christ ascends, and therefore so do you because you believed in Him. By not proclaiming Jesus as Lord of your life, you make the decision to put YOURSELF on the stand. No human outside of Christ lives a sinless life, and the wages of sin is Death - therefore, your choice is to die and spend the afterlife away from Him - and that is perceived as Hell.
My point there is this, God came down and gave everyone an alternative - and it's on us to make the choice. Your parents seemingly have made their choices and when their time comes they won't know the pain of you being damned. If they die before you do - they won't know the pain at all and will have died with hope for you.
2. Morals are most definitely NOT subjective if we're making the assumption God exists as Jesus proclaims - although your angle is significantly more substantial than most who come up to me with that argument. Even Richard Dawkins - the kingpin of New Atheism - lives his life (against his very held beliefs no less!) in a manner that suggests morality is objective as he is quoted on detesting polygamy and affairs, which is something that under a subjective moral worldview would not need criticism as it's not 'immoral' in that sense.You mention Christ's view on Slavery. Allow me to shed some historical light on the situation here. Firstly, Israel was under the Roman Empire at the time and MOST Israelites were used to the confines of slavery as being a normal occurrence with THEM usually being the slaves in the slave-master relationship. Jesus should first not be seen as a political activist - in fact - He even goes as far as to tell the Pharisees trying to trip him on paying taxes to Caesar by saying "Give to God what is God, and give to Caesar what is Caesar's. Knowing this, we can begin to understand that Jesus may not have been concerned with freeing slaves so much as the slave-master scenarios in his parables reaching the ears of those He spoke to. Allow me to propose another verse to you in order to show you why Jesus may hold no concern or even support the idea of slavery and yet still defend moral objectivity.
"And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?” He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” They said to him, “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away?” He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.” - Matthew 19: 3-9
Here, we find out from Christ that not all laws were MORAL laws and that this one on divorce is provisionary because of the human condition. If we're assuming Christ is God as we should be in this scenario, we have God explaining to these Pharisees that the divorce laws were there because the people's hearts were hard. Apply this to Slavery at the time. Jesus is a an Israelite and thus doesn't have the authority in his manly sense to challenge the Roman Empire over the issue. Instead, He focuses on the slaves themselves - and urges them to take the chances at freedom that they are given and advocating faithful service to their masters as they faithfully serve the Lord by parallel comparison. The apostle Paul then gives those in captivity these words - so it would seem the early Christians were more accepting without position of the situation than they were supportive of it:
"Were you called while a slave? Do not be concerned about it. But if you are able to gain your freedom, avail yourself of the opportunity. For whoever was called in the Lord as a slave is a freed person belonging to the Lord, just as whoever was free when called is a slave of Christ."
1. Morality is most likely more objective than the world would have us think.
2. Jesus may only have been accepting and not supportive of slavery.
3. Not all laws pertain to morality.
4. It's more likely the early church was anti-slavery than it was for it - and wasn't in the position to make a political statement about the issue.
NOTE: I done know how to make a spoiler view, so I duel apologize for that.
1. I believe that depends on countless things that would take too long and probably lose a lot of peoples attention to go through, such as "Cosmic Laws" etc
2. I never knew that a god that is the so-called very apitamy of Good would allow something to go wrong not do anyting about, Unless he's trying not to a against something like a rule or law possibly above him (possibly meaning another being or thing greater than him) that would cause him problems but then again isn't god the so called most if so can't he make things a certain way (for make of understanding and/or/ comprehension) wanting like that and not really moving a thought? If there were such things as "he's trying to teach or tell me something or he "Trialing" me (wow quotes in quotes (lol))" then why would a god supposedly need to do that in the first place why couldn't he make a world that he wanted in the first place Im mean the bible already tells you that he a supposedly perfect god failed by literally telling you how "One day he will make a perfect world..." that was in Genesis to Exodus meaning Genesis: so called the first people Adam and Eve partook of the apple doesn't matter who or how many he fucked up by making "imperfect beings" in a world that was supposedly perfect and by even having a tree that was there perfectly ware of shit he did he purposely made them still and he supposedly purposely made them with the desire they had already had if you want say well the Bible does tell you (not directly) that all of "evil"/sin was basically in/of/or in itself that tree. Now it doesn't have to be evil but you get the point of basically that treat "bad" things about it and ironically he said that it was **his** tree ,*pause and think about that*, and a fucking snake called the devil later on was in that fucking tree wait a minute aside from the fucking devil being in that tree why is he there in the first place what kind of fucking (dumbs) god makes a world that he suppossedly wants perfectly. I would say more but I there is so much, even excluding Christian god going to Christianity alone will be a novel and/or series in itself I have been christian and went Deep Web like deep into it and it was there that I found out some truths and left it.As far as slaves no god that actually the imagery of christianity would make there god look like would allow such to be and or come unless something above it prevented it.
3. Morailty: (for the sake of understanding) The way an entity sees something aligned with amongst what it also sees as so so called "seperations" . (also for the sake of what perceive to be "human" understanding) What an individual/entity sees as good or evil. Laws are there to decide what is good or evil based upon what the creator/creator of those laws see. So virtually all laws are fundamentally made off of/from morality (Using logic that the majority choose to "Understand" and/or"Follow"
4. America was By Catholics and is Run by Christians last time i checked. That Includes coming up with the Idea of slavery and Allowing it. The reason why It was changed is because of the current fact that Christian have different points of view on "earthly" things
I forgot to say this in the beggining of my comment.
NOTE:I'm not taking sides but will challenge the side that I think is "doing better" for a lack of much better at the current time.
As far as my belief of wether god(s) exist or not I USUAL won't tell but Due to I so called find as to be "Recompense" I'll answer If request due to fact that pretty much everyone shared on my topic just know it might be long If I decide to go into details.
Ideas on God and the creation of the universe are always changing for me. I grew up in a family that was loosely religious, my dad was catholic and my mum was christian and i occasionally went to sunday church with an older sister. I believed in this religion simply because i was brought up with it, the same way a primary school child learns maths because they learn it from school, it was just life. I wasn't told to question what i was taught, from religion to maths.(I should say here my mother was adamant that I should be the one to make my own decision on my religion while i was growing up, not someone else, but i was still taught these views through church and my primary/lower school)
In my teen years I started questioning my religion and why i believed in it, and why other people would do the same.
I no longer believe in any organised religion. The same way a Hindu wouldn't believe in the Christian Faith, or a Catholic wouldnt believe in the Muslim faith(although a quote comes to mind right now thats something like "religions are all strands of the same rug, just different colours" - someone that isnt me).
I have plans to re-read the bible as well as other religious texts such as the Qur'an, not so I can follow these religions but just so I can understand their followers better.
For me, I don't need a god or a religion to do the right thing(...most of the time), and don't really like the threat of an eternity of flames as a way to reinforce this.
Just thought I'd throw my two cents into this, since the community seems to be.(didn't mean any hate if any of my comment came across that way)
I'll say it like this:
You want change. (advanced translation: I thought of the same thing as well I duel like that you doing such for yourself please don't be discouraged share your experiences if that is what you choose, for I would like to hear about your experience.)
It'd be interesting to have a thread that discussed life philosophies rather than simply the subset of such called religions. I'm not sure if discussing such would be going off topic here, but I will give a short opinion summing up my opinion on god/God.
I, personally, think the existence of a deity is unlikely. I also think that if a deity exists, then no modern religion has gotten their desires or commands quite correct, as every single one has been muddled and distorted over time and there are so many with equal claims to legitimacy. I don't see the idea of multiple gods as absurd; in fact I find it far more likely than a single god who simply chooses to torment some and uplift others. I consider myself somewhat of an antitheist, though; in my opinion religion has had an overall harmful influence on humanity as a whole.
Yeah that was the point but out my ignorance I pretty assumed that religion was a type of philosphy which it "is" or "can be" but it is group based and not individualistic so as some type of gratitude I will make topi no that if you already haven't because that too is something that I want to know about people or one of "endless" things
-
I have mac and I must they are not slower than Pc not to mention that I have had also Pc
Short sightly informative summary: Macs are not entirely exclusive and there are program that can make every PC file Mac compatible or its own wether it be app etc to use not to mention that macs have a smoother software system.
For Pc: Invert the above not entire exclusive program to work mac files nor a smooth as mac but doesn't mean it is slower etc.
At the end of the day you are comparing Light to Dark or for a better analysis you are comparing left to right.
-
How have SSB4 Custom moves changed the game?
Are they needed?
Do they do any good for the game?
Will this be a trend to eventual custom Character sets entirely?
Will there be new ways to alter the meta?
SSB4 custom Items?
Custom Maps (If this already exists please keep in mind I don't know a lot about Super Smash Bros.)?
-
Will there be new character Additions to SSB4? Viridi (Kid Icarus Uprising), Mew (Pokemon), Bomber man (Bomber Man), Knuckles (Sonic Series), Chibi Robo (Chibi Robo) what else could there be?
-
How has Pokemon Metagame and Gameplay as a whole changed due to Mega Evolutions?
What are some possibilities for the future?
Permanent Megas?
Permanent Primals?
Will there a new type of evolution in the future allowing Non fully evolved pokemon to Mega evolve?
Those are some starters.
-
8/31/15:
You do know that those that I have seen With there motion tend to have power way beyond those that don't and I mean more than the character in anime not to mention those with control over them?
In Other words Emotions are a form of power.
-
Now that I think about it Ditto seems like a pretty colorful pokemon by way of transform.
-
Yes, I do believe in God. Specifically, I am a Christ-follower, meaning I believe in the triune God that is the Father (Yahweh; God.), His Son Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. All three in one, one in three.
---
I hold belief in Jesus is entirely faith based, but if you want "commandments" there are only two of them that are deemed most important. "Love the Lord your God, and love others as yourself." - I hold that loving God means being aware of our sinful nature and making a concerted effort to atone - and that loving others means being quick to be self-less and instead try to help humanity prosper, while making others aware of the reality that is our sin so that they too can fight against it. I hold that all interactions must be between God and the believer, meaning things like forced conversion and coercing Christ are ineffective so much as simply going out and following Jesus' request to make disciples through exalting the good news of our undeserved forgiveness. Ultimately - the "guideline" if you will is simply believe.
---
I believe the true meaning of "Religion" is best applicable to what is usually the second meaning of the word found in most reputable dictionaries, being a SYSTEM of faith and worship. - and my opinion of the Christian "religion" varies depending on the area. In America for example, the Christian "religion" is FAR from ideal - whereas over seas in unfriendly areas such as Vietnam believers - even under watchful eye of their government - have it down perfectly. It should be noted in this section that I don't worship religion. I worship Jesus Christ.
---
The is no problem with having a singular God so long as you are following Him (and if you are NOT following Him than the issue would be that you are not agreeable with Him.) The larger issue than lack of agreement is posited in other two scenarios. In the instances where there is no God or there are many Gods everything is subjective to individual taste. While this may sound like a nice and fluffy thing to have in some arenas, one cannot justifiably have a justice system in place if the rules are subjective and the defendant can hold that according to his subjectivity he wasn't breaking the law. Also, multiple Gods tend to grapple for power and control in the lives of their followers and lead to contradictions. Contradictory faith and subjectivity are the biggest looming issues in non/polytheistic scenarios. You have to know WHAT you believe in -AND- know it to be consistent to the world around you.
---
I see myself as one of God's vessels, which would be lower on the totem pole than God Himself. The cool thing though, is that He came down to my level and died so that one day I could ascend as He did regardless of current positioning. No other religion advocates this model.
---
With Christianity, the cornerstone of ANYONE's faith is the real-life historicity of the Resurrection. If you can definitively prove Jesus didn't rise from the dead, you prove Christians are fools.
"And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain." - Paul, 1st Corinthians 15:14
I duely appreciate the opinion and perspective you have shared. It has been a while since I have heard a Christian speak on such a subject not that I don't expect such to happen or only expect those more aligned away from christianity or toward un religiousness to interact with this subject but it has been a while since I heard a religious person talk about especially with What I presume to be unoveremotional or offended thoughts in return Thank you for that, And I hope for more opinions and perspectives regardless I literally don't judge. Thank you.
-
Earth is not our real life. It's akin to a simulation.
The name of our real planet is Cerri. It's not an afterlife, because we were born there before we came to earth. However, not everyone even goes to earth; there's not nearly enough space for all of us. Why Earth even exists and how who gets sent here is determined, I have no clue. I'm not sure anybody knows.
Cerri isn't a place with no problems. There's no such thing as a place without difficulties. It just doesn't have pointless problems that Earth has. People don't die at home. If they sustain too much injury, they go into a coma that they inevitably wake up from. How long the coma lasts depends on the kind of injury they received.
Age and gender are wrong as Earth understands them. Age has nothing to do with how many years you've been alive. I'm not talking about the adults that say "I'm a kid at heart" because they collect plushies and watch Disney movies. I mean that someone's mind and body can literally stop developing at a certain time. I stopped developing around 12-14. Also, males and females don't have physical differences at home. Each individual is given a body that matches their soul. Gender is just an aura related to vague mannerisms that everyone picks up on. We don't have genitals at home; there's a small hole where the part between your legs is on earth. There are trans* people on earth because earth gave them the wrong type of body and earth associates gender with body type.
We're a lot faster, stronger, and have better senses all around at home. It's not unusual for an athlete to be able to jump over several-story buildings. We can also eat a lot more at home, and there's no such thing as gaining or losing weight because your body's condition is permanent; it's one that matches your soul.
It's not always peace, but there aren't sadistic psychopaths who hurt people for pleasure. Every organization fights for a cause and legitimately wants to help people. Some of them are just misguided. Think Archie and Maxie from RSE/ORAS.
There are confirmed aliens. Cerri isn't the only planet. The Empyrean Council is one of the oldest groups of aliens. On the subject of age, people don't have wrinkles. Those who continue to mature past 30-40 will still have a body that looks around the range. There are people and other species members who are hundreds of years old.
There are guardians who watch over each country. Some countries on earth like Scotland and Egypt also exist on Cerri, and they have countries not on earth like one called Serenity. Each country has its own language.
It's impossible to lose a limb or suffer any other disgusting earth condition or disfigurement.
Those are the basics.
Where can I find more information one this? I want to hear more.
-
Azumarill is my favourite pokemon of all time so I'd go with it.
So many new topics though...
There are a lot more especially if the admins stop deleting some of them they already deleted over 10.
-
I can honestly see both and understand them as well. I have things that go with what both of you are saying.
-
I'm strolling down the lesbian cloud when suddenly a meteor ridden by Will Smith appears to destroy the peaceful dinosaurs below. The dinosaurs decide to take action and manufacture a laser strong enough the destroy the smith metoer. However, the lesbian cloud would be caught in the crossfire. So now I am stuck wondering how o save this poor homosexual nimbus before it is pulverised by a meteor or eradicated by Dinolasers.
You could go Kaoken with Cthulu and take the meteor out? Or maybe even Make it rain politoeds or have never lands block the meteor? Those are viable options Right?
-
You could go Kaoken with Cthulu and take the meteor out?
-
I really want to hear this preferebly in 6 yen terms but as long its valid to the topic I don't care.
Which one is superior?
Azumarill or Diggersby
-
Vivilon from Pokemon Reborn is in my opinion the most colorful (cause it pretty much the only I saw with the most colors so far).
Public Story
in Creative Works
Posted
Prolouge: You are in a dark forest, whit trees of great size and diversity surrounding you, unaware of the specific location that you are at. However you still have not forgotten the location the main camp that the rest of the camp members leaders are at. Why are you so far away from camp [Enter}.
*Continue The Story"
...