Ninpen 0 Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Since clearly we weren't getting the response that we were hoping, we're downsizing the tournament. Putting it up to you! 3 teams of 4, or 4 teams of 3? Link to post Share on other sites
AZKnight 0 Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 4 teams of 3 That way there won't be a tie with the team battles since three is an odd number. And if we don't do a round robin, then the numbers are equal for a (small) bracket. Then there is the fact its easier to plan with a smaller group. Link to post Share on other sites
N8theGr8 2 Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 I [i]would[/i] join, but I don't get how this works. If the managers draft the teams and play the battles, what's the point of everyone else? Link to post Share on other sites
Bullet 0 Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 I voted 4 teams of 3 for 2 simple reasons A. Odd numbers of players per team B. More teams Link to post Share on other sites
AZKnight 0 Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 [quote name='N8theGr8' post='5348' date='Oct 8 2010, 03:21 AM']I [i]would[/i] join, but I don't get how this works. If the managers draft the teams and play the battles, what's the point of everyone else?[/quote] The managers are just the team leaders. They don't have any other special privileges past picking their players and being the "face" of the team. Everyone on the team still battles. Link to post Share on other sites
N8theGr8 2 Posted October 8, 2010 Share Posted October 8, 2010 Oh...I thought by drafting players, that meant you literally draft Pokemon to be used. As in, there are no duplicates of a Pokemon. That would be pretty cool though. So...I guess I'm in. Link to post Share on other sites
Ninpen 0 Posted October 8, 2010 Author Share Posted October 8, 2010 People have experimented with that, N8. Anyway, glad to see you're on board. Sign up in the signup thread, if you please. Link to post Share on other sites
Ninpen 0 Posted October 9, 2010 Author Share Posted October 9, 2010 We're going with 4 teams of 3, since that seems to be the popular choice. SECOND POLL. 3 OU players per team, or 1 OU, UU, and Ubers player? Link to post Share on other sites
Bullet 0 Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 It says I already voted @_@ Eh, I'd vote for 1 OU, 1 Ubers, and 1 UU per team for more diversity Link to post Share on other sites
Administrators Ikaru 107 Posted October 9, 2010 Administrators Share Posted October 9, 2010 I can play a team in any tier so honestly I don't mind... but, OU vs NU will be hell if both sides know what they're doing. ._. Link to post Share on other sites
AZKnight 0 Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 I think you would have to face the person in the same tier as you. There wouldn't be a case where it would be UU vs Ubers. Personally, I don't care much for the Ubers scene so I would rather see OU, UU, and NU. But either way, I want diversity of tiers on the teams. Link to post Share on other sites
Administrators Ikaru 107 Posted October 9, 2010 Administrators Share Posted October 9, 2010 [quote]But either way, I want diversity of tiers on the teams.[/quote] Agreed, let's not make this like Team Neo and end up with the same Pokemon on every one of our opponents' teams.. ._. Link to post Share on other sites
N8theGr8 2 Posted October 9, 2010 Share Posted October 9, 2010 I'm with AZ here, mainly because some of you have seen my new NU team...and it's pretty awesome. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE replace Ubers with NU. Please? But either way, I'm not voting for 3 OU teams. How boring would that be? EDIT: Doc, to completely reset the poll, you have to delete it and make a new one. It says I already voted even though I haven't yet. Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.