sadcatto

I joined in 2015, had some fun and kinda forgot about it. 18 now, maybe I'll be giving it another shot.

as seen here...

Yeah, I would. It would probably hurt to eat my companion, but... y'know, gotta survive. It's not going to eat me, surely (humans sit at the top of the food chain), but it would probably be pretty gross meat anyways. I mean, it's probably all gristly and tough, and it would probably be hard to get around the bones... ah, well. I'm not dead.

like lemon eyes. Cranberries are the...

cause mass destruction

land of Oz.

But if the

But canon states

But it couldn't...

the burger could

2 Nooooooo!

who could transform...

866. 200 off? Close enough. SATAN.

Living over 100, huh? I'd rather not. I feel like being such an unusually old person would really leave me as a somehow still living artifact. The difference between someone like that and say, a Holocaust survivor, or a survivor of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, or a survivor of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, or... never mind, you get it. Anyways, the difference is that a survivor of an atrocity has a story to tell, and they are capable of doing so. Someone who is the oldest person alive is likely unable to speak, move, or even breathe independently. If you can't breathe on your own, and you can't tell the doctors not to do something, I feel like it's wrong to keep someone living like that. Damn, that was a depressing thing to write.